Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 30;40(5):051720. doi: 10.1118/1.4802750

Table 2.

A part of the dosimetric comparison for patient #1 between ERVO, ERSO, and REAS methods with D90 goals set to 85–100 Gy. The average delivery time was computed for all D90 goals in the range with 1 Gy spacing, and if the specified D90 goal could not be achieved, the delivery time with the best D90 is used instead and the delivery time will be marked with an * mark.

    Achieved Bladder Sigmoid Rectum Delivery Azimuthal emission
D90 goal (Gy) D90 (Gy) D2cc (Gy) D2cc (Gy) D2cc (Gy) time (min/fx) angle Δφ (deg)
85 ERVO 85.00 87.57 52.45 70.28 4.96 303.75
  ERSO 85.00 88.69 52.63 70.20 5.02 303.75
  REAS 85.00 86.54 55.77 74.22 4.89 303.75
90 ERVO 90.00 89.41 53.67 73.15 5.43 292.50
  ERSO 90.00 84.34 57.07 73.42 5.70 281.25
  REAS 90.00 87.37 55.51 73.11 5.62 281.25
95 ERVO 95.00 89.13 57.60 74.36 7.08 236.25
  ERSO 94.43* 83.03 55.60 74.74 23.95 67.50
  REAS 95.00 82.85 55.67 74.62 7.69 213.75
100 ERVO 100.00 88.67 57.31 74.21 16.92 101.25
  ERSO 94.43* 83.03 55.60 74.74 23.95 67.50
  REAS 100.00 89.94 55.90 74.03 19.18 90.00
Average delivery time ERVO: 7.9 min/fx, ERSO: 13.5 min/fx, REAS: 8.7 min/fx