Skip to main content
. 2013 May 17;8(5):e63740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063740

Table 6. Comparison of teeth size of the Ust’-Khaita canid with select canid populations. All measurements in mm.

P3 length P4 length M1 length M1 length
Specimen/population N Range Mean St.d. N Range Mean St.d. N Range Mean St.d. N Range Mean St.d.
Ust'-Khaita canid 1 14.9 1 22.1 1 14.9 1 26.53
Paleolithic dogsa 5 14.60–17.50 16.28 1.24 8 23.86–27.30 25.23 1.15 6 14.60–19.00 16.69 1.73 2 25.50–29.00 27.25
Pleistocene wolvesa 5 16.50–17.93 17.33 0.57 6 25.10–28.60 26.38 1.32 5 15.90–18.57 17.49 1.13 3 30.52–31.70 30.98 0.63
Prehistoric dogsb 3 12.80–14.00 13.15 0.6 3 17.20–19.50 18.67 1.27 2 21.6–26.9 24.25
Baltic Sea Mesolithic dogsd 18 16.1–21.1 18.5 1.53 29 19.4–24.8 22.2 1.31
Cis-Baikal Middle Holocene dogsc 8 11.2–13.8 12.18 0.82 9 18.0–21.0 19.5 0.92 9 12.0–15.0 13.24 0.84 5 20.63–24.30 21.74 1.47
Recent Siberian wolvesa,c 25 22.82–28.00 24.77 1.47 11 13.97–18.01 15.78 1.17 19 26.70–32.90 29.25 1.77
Recent Canis lupus chancoa,c 8 23.60–26.90 25.01 1.11 8 26.40–31.00 28.71 1.75
Recent Siberian Huskiesa,c 15 17.09–21.50 19 1.05 4 11.11–12.50 11.66 0.59 15 20.60–24.50 22.53 1.19
Recent N.A. Arctic dogsc 38 10.90–15.21 13.83 0.93 36 18.18–24.09 21.07 1.19 38 11.72–15.02 13.6 0.76 35 21.30–26.05 24.08 1.33
a

This study, [24].

b

[28], [29], [30].

c

This study.

d

[31].