Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct;50(12):2773–2788. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.031

Table 6A.

Correlations between predictor variables and word naming RT used in the regression model.

WL OrthN SES Group WL_Group SES_Group LnCE_Freq
IV WL 1
OrthN −.754⁎⁎ 1
SES .963⁎⁎ −.761⁎⁎ 1
Group −.034 .031 −.030 1
WL_Group .002 −.009 .005 −.013 1
SES_Group .005 −.012 .007 −.011 .964⁎⁎ 1
LnCE_Freq −.079⁎⁎ .219⁎⁎ −.114⁎⁎ .027 0 −.001 1



DV RT(s) .197⁎⁎ −.193⁎⁎ .207⁎⁎ .604⁎⁎ .178⁎⁎ .186⁎⁎ −.144⁎⁎

Note: ⁎⁎Correlation is significant at the .01 level; Correlation is significant at the .05 level. WL: word length; OrthN: orthographic neighbourhood size; SES: summed error score. Group: severity group; SES_Group: the product of summed error score and group; WL_Group: the product of word length and group; Ln_CE_Freq: log CELEX frequency.