Table 3.
Summary of survey and focus group results on scope of permission for future use options for biobanking
Method | Survey (n = 751), % preferred (95% CI) | Focus groups (n = 48), % preferred | Common likes | Common concerns |
---|---|---|---|---|
Broad | 41 (37–45%) | 54 | Allows for flexibility in research; logical given uncertainty of future research; logistically easier; spurs research and research output | Minimally informative; disallows individual control over sample and information use |
Categorical | 25 (21–28%) | 21 | Provides some level of information and choice over future sample and information use; can participate in research that has personal meaning | Categorical choices may be confusing or misunderstood; could hinder research; logistically complicated; people may not feel qualified to make selections |
Study specific | 29 (25–32%) | 21 | Promotes knowledge, choice and control over research participation; may facilitate return of research results | Recontact fatigue; may hinder research if subjects cannot be reached or if not enough people consent to a particular study; resource intensive and impractical |
No preference | 4 (3–6%) | 4 |