Table 6.
Summary of secondary efficacy variables.
| Variable | Description | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Posture | Cat's mobility and posture within the cage | (1) Normal |
| (2) Mildly abnormal | ||
| (3) Moderately abnormal | ||
| (4) Severely abnormal | ||
|
| ||
| Behavior | Cat's overall comfort, levels of aggression and vocalization, and ease of handling | Behavior as viewed from a distance |
| (1) Appears comfortable | ||
| (2) Questionable comfort | ||
| (3) Distressed animal | ||
| Behavior following social interaction | ||
| (1) Normal | ||
| (2) Mildly abnormal | ||
| (3) Moderately abnormal | ||
| (4) Severely abnormal | ||
|
| ||
| Pain on palpation | Amount of pressure applied to sites adjacent to incisions that elicited a pain response (e.g., withdrawal of paw, discomfort, or vocalization). | Paw onychectomy. Pressure assessed using a Palpometer∗. Response based on audio feedback: |
| (1) 5 beeps (greatest recorded pressure) | ||
| (2) 4 beeps | ||
| (3) 3 beeps | ||
| (4) 2 beeps | ||
| (5) 1 beep (lightest recorded pressure) | ||
| Castration or ovariohysterectomy skin incision. Based on subjective evaluation: | ||
| (1) Significant pressure | ||
| (2) Moderate pressure | ||
| (3) Slight pressure | ||
|
| ||
| Overall pain control | Subjective overall assessment | (1) Well controlled |
| (2) Moderately controlled | ||
| (3) Poorly controlled | ||
*The index finger mounted device (Palpometer, University of Victoria Innovation and Development Corp. Victoria, BC, Canada) scores of 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 beeps corresponded to pressures of 200, 300, 450, 600, and 800 gf/cm2, respectively [22]. All devices were calibrated before use.