Table 3.
Summary of multiple logistic regression analyses using predisposing, enabling and need factors as predictors of substance abuse treatment utilization
|
Independent variables |
Coloured participants (N = 489) |
Black African participants (N =500) |
|---|---|---|
| OR a (95% CI)b,c | OR (95% CI)d | |
|
Predisposing variables |
|
|
| Gender (Male) |
0.66 (0.34-1.31) |
0.98 (0.21-4.57) |
| NES (values range from 10-90) |
0.99 (0.91-6.61) |
-----------------e |
|
Need for treatment variables |
|
|
| Think need treatment (Yes) |
-----------------e |
13.70 (1.44-125.00) |
| Others think need treatment (Yes) |
1.28 (0.54-3.06) |
38.46 (3.98-333.33) |
| SOCRATES Problem Recognition scale (values range from 7 to 35) |
1.04 (0.95-1.13) |
0.87 (0.73-1.05) |
| SOCRATES Ambivalence scale (values range from 4 to 20) |
1.04 (0.89-1.23) |
1.12 (0.87-1.45) |
| SOCRATES Taking Steps to Change scale (values range from 8 to 40) |
1.05 (0.99-1.12) |
1.30 (1.13-1.48) |
|
Enabling/restricting variables |
|
|
| Awareness: # known treatment centres (values range from 0-8) |
4.42 (2.96-6.61) |
35.50 (11.33-111.25) |
| Geographic access: Time to treatment in 15 min intervals (values range from 1-9) |
0.49 (0.30-0.81) |
0.04 (0.01-0.15) |
| Affordability barriers scale (values range from 1-5) |
0.83 (0.79-0.87) |
0.90 (0.83-0.98) |
| Stigma consciousness scale (values range from 1-10) | 2.04 (1.52-2.73) | 1.31 (0.89-1.95) |
aOR Odds Ratio.
b 95% CI = 95% confidence intervals.
c Model summary: χ2 (10; N = 489) = 422.89, p < 0.001; Nagelkerke R2 = 0.579.
d Model summary: χ2 (10; N = 500) = 590.91, p < 0.001; Nagelkerke R2 = 0.691.
e Variables not entered into the model.
f The bolded odds ratios refer to statistically significant associations.