Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 15;13:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-19

Table 5.

Simulation results in a domain with ICC = 5%, Pearson correlation X1 and random effect 0.0, number of patients 100, number of centers 5

 
Apparent performance
Test performance
  Standard model Marginal risk calculation Conditional risk calculation Standard model Marginal risk calculation
Harrell’s C-index †
0.82 (0.742; 0.889)
0.82 (0.743; 0.888)
0.84 (0.752; 0.913)
0.77 (0.718; 0.779)
0.77 (0.719; 0.779)
C-index within clusters ‡
0.82 (0.100)
0.82 (0.096)
0.82 (0.096)
0.77 (0.032)
0.77 (0.032)
Calibration intercept*
-0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.06
Calibration intercept* within clusters ‡
-0.00 (0.295)
-0.00 (0.319)
0.01 (0.000)
-0.01 (0.537)
0.03 (0.545)
Calibration slope (overall)
1.00
0.99
1.05
0.71
0.69
Calibration slope within clusters ‡ 1.06 (0.100) 1.01 (0.108) 1.07 (0.000) 0.74 (0.017) 0.72 (0.018)

* With calibration slope equal to 1 (i.e. calibration in the large).

† overall performance (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles).

‡ median of overall performance from 100 simulations (median of within cluster performances).