Skip to main content
. 2013 May 20;8(5):e61254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061254

Figure 2. The ideal double pedigree protocol to study the interactions between genotype, environment and culture.

Figure 2

This can be simplified in the lab by providing only one type of environment. Each column represents one family and hence one set of parental genes reorganized in different individual genotypes. The colored boxes represent different environments. O1 and O2 are siblings. This illustrates the possibility of linking families across environments. Squares and circles are male and female parents and hexagons are offspring. In this design we consider that there are two identified cultures (e.g. song dialects or languages). Sample sizes are set at two which is the minimum necessary to account for residual variance. Two-way arrows indicate partial cross-fostering among environments, families and cultures. The arrows starting and ending on the same family corresponds to controls for the effect of the manipulation where eggs or young are handled, moved over a comparable period of time, then put back in their original nest or habitat. In this cross-foster design all combinations of environment, genotype and culture can be created and replicated. Ideally, some of the cross-fosterings are performed within the same culture/environment/family to test for the manipulation effect. The cross-fosters are then used to build the matrix of cultural distances among individuals, which describes the cultural pedigree (see text). An advantage of the animal model is that it is robust enough to cope with unbalanced designs resulting from the unavoidable death of some individuals.