Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Sep 19;44(3):323–329. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.08.008

Table 2.

Motivational interviewing (MI) versus control group outcomes among adults in treatment with depression who report hazardous drinking or drug use (N=104).

MI
intervention
Control
χ2 Effect
size h


N % n %
Total study group 52 52
Any 3+ drinking days
   Baseline 37 72.6 36 69.2 0.1 -
   3months 24 49.0 31 63.3 2.0 .29
   6months 24 47.1 30 57.7 1.2 .21
Any cannabis use
   Baseline 10 19.2 20 38.5 4.7.* -
   3months 8 16.3 21 42.9 8.3.* .61
   6months 11 21.6 19 36.5 2.8 .23
Mean SD Mean SD t (df) Effect
size d

BDI-II Depression score
   Baseline 24.8 9.6 24.6 11.3 0.1 (102) -
   3months 20.3 12.0 20.8 11.8 0.2 (96) .04
   6months 17.4 11.4 18.3 12.4 0.4 (101) .08

Notes: Baseline, 3- and 6-month questions refer to alcohol and drug consumption in the previous 30days. Significance of intervention and control group differences was tested using chi-square and t-tests. We report Cohen's (1988) h for proportions and d for means.

*

p<.05.