. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 21.

Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2010 Dec;24(6):698–708. doi: 10.1037/a0021751

Table 2.

Regression Results Predicting Young Women Experiencing Sexual and Dating Victimization (N = 122)

	Unwanted touching						Forced sex
	Model 1			Model 5			Model 1
	b (SE)	Wald	OR [CI]	b (SE)	Wald	OR [CI]	b (SE)	Wald	OR [CI]
Sister’s prior victimization^a	1.21 (0.52)	5.34	3.36^* [1.2–9.4]	1.39 (0.59)	5.62	4.03^* [1.3–12.7]	1.54 (0.71)	4.77	4.67^* [1.2–18.6]
Neighborhood crime				−0.03 (0.42)	0.01	0.97 [0.4–2.2]
Mothers’ monitoring^b				0.11 (0.81)	0.02	1.11 [0.2–5.5]
Mother single parent^c				0.05 (0.64)	0.01	1.05 [0.3–3.7]
Crime × Monitoring^b				0.17 (0.59)	0.08	1.18 [0.4–3.7]
Crime × Single parent^c				0.70 (0.34)	1.96	3.97^* (1.0–16.5)
	R²	ΔR²		R²	ΔR²		R²	ΔR²
Step 1. Covariates	.01	.01		.01	.01		.01	.01
Step 2. Sister’s victimization^a	.06	.05^*		.06	.05^*		.07	.06^*
Step 3. Predictors^d				.09	.03
Step 4. Interactive effects				.11	.03

	Forced sex			Dating aggression
	Model 5			Model 1			Model 5
	b (SE)	Wald	OR [CI]	b (SE)	Wald	OR [CI]	b (SE)	Wald	OR [CI]
Sister’s prior victimization^a	1.82 (0.92)	3.93	6.17^* [1.0–37.3]	2.46 (0.82)	9.12	11.73^** [2.4–58.0]	3.94 (1.45)	7.44	16.65^** [2.2–98.3]
Neighborhood crime	1.15 (0.58)	3.92	3.16^* [1.0–9.8]				3.19 (2.03)	2.45	3.19 [1.0–9.8]
Mothers’ monitoring^b	2.56 (1.22)	4.41	12.95^* [1.2–41.2]				− 2.09 (1.63)	1.65	0.12 [0.1–3.0]
Mother single parent^c	−0.46 (0.94)	0.24	0.63 [0.10–3.9]				1.23 [1.04]	1.08	3.36 [1.2–9.3]
Crime × Monitoring^b	− 1.77 (0.96)	3.43	0.17 [0.03–1.1]				− 3.01 [1.37]	4.80	0.02^* [0.0–1.9]
Crime × Single parent^c	−0.08 (0.60)	0.02	0.93 (0.3–3.0)				− 3.72 (2.21)	2.83	0.05 (0.003–0.7)
	R²	ΔR²		R²	ΔR²		R²	ΔR²
Step 1. Covariates	.01	.01		.13^**	.13^**		.13^*	.13^*
Step 2. Sister’s victimization^a	.07	.06^*		.21^***	.08^**		.21^**	.08^**
Step 3. Predictors^d	.14^*	.07^*					.22^**	.01
Step 4. Interactive effects	.17	.03					.28^**	.05^*

Note. Model covariates were women’s age, race-ethnicity, whether live with sister, and whether a teen parent. Unstandardized coefficients are shown. OR = odds ratio; CI = 95% confidence interval.

The specific form as predicting.

High scores reflect attentive monitoring.

Coded as 0 = no, 1 = yes.

Predictors were neighborhood crime, mothers’ monitoring, and mothers’ single-parent status.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .001.