Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 3;68(6):667–674. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls233

Table 4.

ROC Curve Comparisons Between Chronological Age (CA) and Estimates of Biological Age (BA) for the Full Sample and by Age Group

Full Sample Aged 30–59 years Aged 60–75 years
AUC (SE) p Value AUC (SE) p Value AUC (SE) p Value
CA 0.827 (0.0052) Reference 0.731 (0.0108) Reference 0.670 (0.0067) Reference
PCA 0.840 (0.0050) <.0001 0.773 (0.0105) <.0001 0.712 (0.0062) <.0001
MLR1 0.847 (0.0050) <.0001 0.762 (0.0106) <.0001 0.727 (0.0061) <.0001
MLR2 0.849 (0.0049) <.0001 0.772 (0.0105) <.0001 0.727 (0.0077) <.0001
KDM1 0.853 (0.0049) <.0001 0.774 (0.0104) <.0001 0.743 (0.0059) <.0001
KDM2 0.854 (0.0049) <.0001 0.779 (0.0103) <.0001 0.737 (0.0077) <.0001

Note: AUC = area under the ROC curve; PCA = principal component analysis; MLR1 = multiple linear regression with 10 variables; MLR2 = multiple linear regression with 7 variables; KDM1 = Klemera and Doubal method with 10 variables; and KDM2 = Klemera and Doubal method with 7 variables.