Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Dec 11;145(2):341–348. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.10.043

TABLE 3.

A. Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients that experienced improvement in MR after aortic valve intervention versus those that did not improve

Improved
(n=137)
No Improvement
(n=150)
P value

Age (years) 74.7 ± 9.5 74.5 ± 9.9 p = ns

Sex
  Male 54.7% (n=75) 56.7% (n=85) p = ns
  Female 45.3% (n= 62) 43.3% (n=65)

Race
  Caucasian 90.5% (n=124) 91.3% (n=137) p = ns
  African American 8.0% (n=11) 4.7% (n=7)
  Asian 0.0% (n=0) 1.3% (n=2)
  Hispanic 0.0% (n=0) 1.3% (n=2)
  Other/unspecified 1.5% (n=2) 1.3% (n=2)

Atrial fibrillation/flutter 24.1% (n=33) 28.7% (n=43) p = ns

Diabetes 30.7% (n=42) 28.0% (n=42) p = ns

Hypertension 81.0% (n=111) 81.3% (n=122) p = ns

Previous MI 19.7% (n=27) 25.3% (n=38) p = ns

Heart failure 82.5% (n=113) 90.0% (n=135) p = ns

NYHA class
  1 1.5% (n=2) 1.3% (n=2) p = ns
  2 26.2% (n=36) 32.7% (n=49)
  3 43.0% (n=59) 42.7% (n=64)
  4 10.2% (n=14) 13.3% (n=20)

Cerebrovascular disease 19.9% (n=26) 20.7% (n=31) p = ns

Peripheral arterial disease 19.0% (n=22) 19.3% (n=29) p = ns

Dialysis 2.2% (n=3) 2.0% (n=3) p = ns

Creatinine 1.19 ± 0.972 1.12 ± 0.769 p = ns

Ejection fraction (%) 54.0% ±13.9% (n=135) 56.0% +13.6% (n=147) p = ns

Mean aortic valve gradient (mm Hg) 45.4±16.0 (n=136) 43.4±16.5 (n=149) p = ns

Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mm Hg) 27.2 ± 9.7 (n=90) 27.9 ± 10.5 (n=94) p = ns

Left atrial diameter (cm) 4.46 ± 0.85 (n=102) 4.50 ± 0.83 (n=107) p = ns

Degree of pre-op MR
  Mild 49.6% (n=68) 70.7% (n=106) p = 0.003
  Mild-moderate 25.5% (n=35) 14.7% (n=22)
  Moderate 21.9% (n=30) 14.7% (n=22)
  Moderate-severe 2.2% (n=3) 0.0% (n=0)
  Severe 0.7% (n=1) 0.0% (n=0)

Any structural MV disease 69.3% (n=95) 63.3% (n=95) p = ns

Mitral annular calcification 62.0% (n=85) 53.3% (n=80) p = ns

Moderate or worse mitral annular calcification 24 1% (n=33) 30.0% (n=45) p = ns

Leaflet abnormality 23.4% (n=32) 21.3% (n=32) p = ns
B. Comparison of operative characteristics of patients that experienced improvement in MR after aortic valve intervention versus those that did not improve

Improved
(n=137)
No improvement
(n=150)

Nature of operation
  AVR 64.2% (n=88) 54.0% (n=81) p = ns
  AVR + CABG 21.9% (n=30) 32.0% (n=48)
  AVR + CABG +other 2.2% (n=3) 2.7% (n=4)
  AVR + other 10.2% (n=14) 7.3% (n=11)
  Aortic root replacement 0.7% (n=1) 0.7% (n=1)
  Aortic root replacement + other 0.7% (n=1) 3.3% (n=5)

Incidence
  First cardiac surgery operation 81.0% (n=111) 81.3% (n=122) p = ns
  First re-operation 17.9% (n=24) 17.3% (n=26)
  Second re-operation 1.5% (n=2) 1.3% (n=2)
  Third re-operation 0.0% (n=0) 0.0% (n=0)

Urgency
  Elective 70.1% (n=96) 70.7% (n=106) p = ns
  Urgent 27.0% (n=37) 27.3% (n=41)
  Emergent 2.9% (n=4) 2.0% (n=3)

Cardiopulmonary bypass time (min) 113 ± 42.6 125 ± 53.9 p = ns

Valve type
  Bioprosthesis 96.3% (n=132) 95.3% (n=143) p = ns
  Mechanical 3.6% (n=5) 4.7% (n=7)
  Homograft 0.0% (n=0) 0.0% (n=0)

Implant Size (mm) 23.8 ± 2.1 23.5 ± 2.2 p = ns

Abbreviations: MI, myocardial infarction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; mmHg millimeters of mercury; cm, centimeters; MV, mitral valve, ns, not significant.

Abbreviations: AVR, aortic valve replacement; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; min, minutes; mm, millimeters; ns, not significant.