Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 28;8(10):1401–1406. doi: 10.4161/hv.21577

Table 3. Modeled projected effectiveness of two RV vaccines against RVGE-related hospitalizations in Malaysia.

Serotypes Proportion of total serotypes in Malaysia (%) Serotype-specific of pentavalent RV vaccine (RV5) A Attributable effectiveness: Base case scenario for RV5 (%)B Attributable effectiveness: sensitivity analysis for RV5 (%)C Serotype-specific of monovalent RV vaccine (RV1) D Attributable effectiveness: Base case scenario for RV1 (%)B Attributable effectiveness: sensitivity analysis for RV1 (%)C
G1
34.7
0.95
33.0
33.0
1.0
34.7
34.7
G2
2.5
0.88
2.2
2.2
1.0
2.5
2.5
G3
1.1
0.93
1.0
1.0
0.95
1.0
1.0
G4
34.6
0.89
30.8
30.8
0.94E
32.5
32.5
G9
12.7
1.0
12.7
12.7
0.92
11.7
11.7
Mixed / untypeable
14.4
-
13.0
0
-
13.0
0
Overall weighted effectiveness
 
 
92.7
79.7
 
95.4
82.8
Overall vaccine effectiveness based on 95% coverage     88.1 75.7   90.6 78.7

Note: RV, rotavirus. (A) Pentavalent human-bovine reassortant RV vaccine (Rotateq®, Merck Co.; ref. 3) (B) Base case scenario assumes 90% efficacy against mixed and untypeable serotypes. (C) Sensitivity analysis assumes 0% efficacy against mixed and untypeable serotypes. (D) Monovalent attenuated human RV vaccine (Rotarix®, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; ref. 5). The efficacy data for RV1 are for prevention of severe RV gastroenteritis based on a score of 11 using the 20-point Vesikari scale. (E) No efficacy figure for G4 was available, so efficacy for non-G1 was taken