Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 1;6(3):363–369. doi: 10.1593/tlo.13166

Table 3.

Cox Proportional Hazard Model for OS in Patients Treated by Irinotecan-Based and Oxaliplatin-Based Regimens.

Variable Irinotecan-Based Regimens (N = 35) Oxaliplatin-Based Regimens (N = 83)


Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis




HR* 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Age .91 .91 .21 .83
≤50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>50 0.92 0.21–4.06 0.91 0.17–4.78 0.66 0.35–1.27 0.92 0.43–1.98
Sex .47 .43 .04 .01
Female 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Male 1.44 0.53–3.87 1.6 0.49–5.19 0.56 0.32–0.98 0.42 0.22–0.78
KRAS .69 .71 .94 .90
Mutant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Wild type 0.82 0.32–2.15 0.83 0.3–2.26 0.98 0.56–1.70 1.04 0.56–1.94
Initial diagnosis as stage IV .49 .45 .14 .16
No 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.41 0.53–3.80 1.52 0.51–4.56 1.69 0.85–3.39 1.77 0.81–3.87
Tumor site .66 .87 .45 .40
Distal 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Proximal 0.75 0.21–2.64 0.88 0.19–4.01 1.26 0.70–2.29 0.74 0.37–1.49
No. of metastatic sites
1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2 0.89 0.31–2.60 .83 0.70 0.22–2.26 .55 2.02 1.13–3.6 .02 2.03 1.12–3.69 .02
≥3 2.00 0.53–7.60 .31 1.98 0.48–8.14 .34 9.82 3.4–28.38 <.001 8.22 2.45–27.6 .001
*

HR, hazard ratio.