Table 3.
Methods of causality assessments for suspected herbal hepatotoxicity
| Methods of causality assessment |
Specific criteria of various causality assessment methods |
|||||
| Expert based | Structured | Qualitative | Quantitative | Liver specific | Liver validated | |
| Prospective evaluation | ||||||
| CIOMS scale | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| MV scale | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Naranjo scale | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No |
| KL method | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
| Ad hoc approach | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Retrospective evaluation | ||||||
| DILIN method | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| WHO method | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Expert opinion | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No |
Compilation of details are derived from previous reports[2,3,60-62,76-79,81,89,102]. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences scale (CIOMS scale) refers to both the original scale[60] and its update (Tables 5 and 6)[62]. Liver-specific and liver-validated criteria reflect hepatotoxicity criteria. Expert based criterion refers to the requirement of several experts for the actual case under consideration. MV scale: Maria and Victorino scale; KL method: Karch and Lasagna method; DILIN method: Drug Induced Liver Injury Network method; WHO method: World Health Organization method.