Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 26;2:187–191. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S22948

Table 2.

Comparison of outcome measures between peer-led group and professional-led group

Chest compression Peer-led group Professional-led group Difference of means (95% CI) or P value*
Compression depth (mm) 43.5 ± 7.6 42.8 ± 9.5 0.75 (−4.5 to 6.0)
Percent compression with adequate depth (38–51 mm) (%) 54.5 ± 31.9 52.5 ± 35.6 2.0 (−18.7 to 22.8)
Proportion of participants with adequate compression depth, n (%) 16/23 (69.6) 12/22 (54.5) P = 0.299
Compression rate (per minute) 104.3 ± 9.1 109.6 ± 10.6 −5.3 (−14.4 to 3.7)
Proportion of participants with adequate compression rate (90–110/minute), n (%) 17/23 (73.9) 8/22 (36.4) P = 0.011
Questionnaire scores
 I mmediately after BLS training 18.2 ± 1.4 18.0 ± 1.7 0.27 (−0.45 to 0.99)
 At 20 weeks after BLS training 17.2 ± 2.3 17.8 ± 2.0 −0.57 (−1.72 to 0.57)

Notes: Values are mean ± SD unless otherwise specified;

*

chi-square test.

Abbreviation: BLS, basic life support.