Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Control Release. 2013 Mar 28;168(2):166–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.03.013

Table 2.

Histological scoring system for (A) overall tissue evaluation, (B) subchondral bone evaluation, and (C) cartilage evaluation in rabbit osteochondral defects [17].

Score
(a) Overall defect evaluation (throughout the entire defect depth)
  1. Percent filling with newly formed tissue
    100% 3
    >50% 2
    <50% 1
    0% 0
  2. Percent degradation of the implant
    100% 3
    >50% 2
    <50% 1
    0% 0
(b) Subchondral bone evaluation (within the bottom 2 mm of defect)
  3. Percent filling with newly formed tissue
    100% 3
    >50% 2
    <50% 1
    0% 0
  4. Subchondral bone morphology
    Normal, trabecular bone 4
    Trabecular bone, with some compact bone 3
    Compact bone 2
    Compact bone and fibrous tissue 1
    Only fibrous tissue or no tissue 0
  5. Extent of new tissue bonding with adjacent bone
    Complete on both edges 3
    Complete on one edge 2
    Partial on both edges 1
    Without continuity on either edge 0
(C) Cartilage evaluation (within the upper 1 mm of defect)
  6. Morphology of newly formed surface tissue
    Exclusively articular cartilage 4
    Mainly hyaline cartilage 3
    Fibrocartilage (spherical morphology observed with ≥ 75% of cells) 2
    Only fibrous cartilage (spherical morphology observed with < 75% of cells) 1
    No tissue 0
  7.Thickness of newly formed cartilage
    Similar to the surrounding cartilage 3
    Greater than the surrounding cartilage 2
    Less than the surrounding cartilage 1
    No cartilage 0
  8. Joint surface regularity
    Smooth, intact surface 3
    Surface fissures (<25% of new surface thickness) 2
    Deep fissures (≥25% of new surface thickness) 1
    Complete disruption of the new surface 0