Skip to main content
Diabetes Care logoLink to Diabetes Care
. 2013 May 15;36(6):1489–1494. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1545

Creatinine Excretion Rate and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy

Steef J Sinkeler 1, Arjan J Kwakernaak 1, Stephan JL Bakker 1, Shahnaz Shahinfar 2, Enric Esmatjes 3, Dick de Zeeuw 4, Gerjan Navis 1,, Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink 4
PMCID: PMC3661815  PMID: 23300289

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The creatinine excretion rate (CER) is inversely associated with mortality in the general and renal transplant population. The CER is a marker for muscle mass. It is unknown whether the CER is associated with outcome in diabetes. We therefore investigated whether the CER is a determinant of all-cause mortality in diabetic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used data from the combined Reduction of Endpoints in Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) and Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) studies. A total of 1,872 patients (58% of the overall population) with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy with valid 24-h urinary creatinine excretion data were included. The primary end point of the analyses was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Mean age was 60 ± 8 years and median CER was 1,407 (total range 400–3,406) mg/day. Body surface area, hemoglobin, black race, and albuminuria were positive independent determinants of the CER, whereas female sex and age were inverse independent determinants of the CER. During a median follow-up of 36 (29–45) months, 300 patients died. In a Kaplan-Meier analysis of sex-stratified tertiles of the CER, risk for all-cause mortality increased with decreasing CER (P < 0.001). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, lower CER (as a continuous variable) was independently associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.39 [95% CI 0.29–0.52], P < 0.001). Adjustment for potential collection errors did not materially change these associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower CER was strongly associated with increased all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. As the CER can be considered a proxy for muscle mass, this puts renewed emphasis on physical condition and exercise in this population.


Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for premature mortality and end-stage renal disease. This increased risk is particularly high in patients with overt diabetic nephropathy (1). Insulin resistance has been identified as one of the determinants of the increased risk for mortality (2).

Recent data show that a low creatinine excretion rate (CER) is independently associated with increased mortality in the general (3) and renal transplant population (4). The mechanisms underlying this association are probably multifactorial, but likely include the fact that the CER serves as a proxy for muscle mass (3,4). Muscle mass is associated with insulin sensitivity, physical activity, nutritional status, and BMI and, as such, is a possible determinant of risk for mortality and adverse events (5). Diabetes is a strong determinant of a reduced CER (58), but it is unknown whether a low CER is associated with mortality in diabetes. In the current study, we therefore investigated whether the CER is associated with all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Study design

The current study is a post hoc analysis of the combined databases of the Reduction of Endpoints in Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) and Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) studies. Both trials investigated the efficacy of angiotensin II receptor blocker (irbesartan in IDNT and losartan in RENAAL) on cardiorenal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The detailed design, rationale, and outcome parameters for these trials have been published previously (9,10).

Study participants

The combined database consists of a total of 3,228 adult patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The patient characteristics of both trials separately and of the combined database have been reported previously (11). Although there were minor differences in the inclusion criteria between both trials, the patient characteristics were generally similar. The mutual inclusion criteria were age between 30 and 70 years and the presence of diabetic nephropathy, defined as serum creatinine levels between 1.0 and 3.0 mg/dL and the presence of proteinuria. The presence of proteinuria was defined as a 24-h urinary protein excretion >500 mg or as a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >300 mg/g in the RENAAL trial, and as a 24-h urinary protein excretion of >900 mg in the IDNT trial. History of cardiovascular disease (CVD) was defined as a history of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, transient ischemic attack, or cerebrovascular accident. The exclusion criteria for both trials were type 1 diabetes and nondiabetic renal disease.

Of all participants included in the RENAAL and IDNT trials, data on the CER were available in 2,360 patients. In the RENAAL trial, a single baseline 24-h urine collection was available, whereas in the IDNT trial, two 24-h urine collections were available. In the IDNT trial, we used the mean of the two 24-h urine collections. The coefficient of variation between the two 24-h urine collections for the CER of IDNT trial patients was 14%.

In the combined database, we excluded patients of non-Caucasian and nonblack race (Asian, n = 126; Hispanic, n = 271; other, n = 71) because the CER estimation formula, which we used in secondary analyses, was not validated in these subgroups (12). According to the literature (12), CER <350 or >3,500 mg/day was regarded as representing an inaccurate 24-h urine collection. These patients were also excluded from the analyses (CER <350, n = 6; CER >3,500, n = 11), leaving a total of 1,872 patients eligible for analyses.

Follow-up assessments and measurements

Urinary creatinine concentration was determined using the Jaffé colorimetric assay. The CER was calculated as urinary creatinine concentration multiplied by urine volume of the 24-h urine collection. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation (13). BMI, as a measure of overall obesity, was calculated by dividing body weight by height squared (kg/m2). Body surface area (BSA) was calculated using the DuBois and DuBois formula (14). Mean arterial pressure was calculated as diastolic pressure plus one-third of pulse pressure.

Outcome parameters

All-cause mortality was the primary end point for the present analyses. We also analyzed the association of the CER with cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality. End points were adjudicated by a blinded end-point committee using rigorous guideline definitions. The specific causes of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular death were not recorded.

Statistical analysis

Data with a normal distribution are presented as mean ± SD, and data with a skewed distribution are presented as median with interquartile range. Differences over sex-stratified tertiles of the CER were tested for statistical significance with one-way ANOVA for normally distributed variables, Kruskal-Wallis for skewed variables, and χ2 test for categorical variables. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to study independent associations with the CER. In these analyses, age, sex, and race were forced into the models, because of their known relationship with the CER. Different models with the additional inclusion of BSA, BMI, or both height and weight combined were then built. In further models, variables with a P < 0.10 in univariate linear regression analyses for associations with the CER were selected for multivariate analysis. Initial prospective analyses were performed by means of a Kaplan-Meier plot of sex-stratified tertiles of the CER for mortality, and significance was assessed using the log-rank test. After this, univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to further evaluate the association of the CER with mortality. For these analyses, the CER was log-transformed because the risk distribution appeared nonlinear. To allow for the assessment of the hazard ratio (HR) per doubling of the CER, log-transformation was performed according to the base of two. In sensitivity analyses, we defined two cutoff values (>50 or >30% deviation from estimated CER values) to determine the impact of stricter exclusion criteria for inaccurate 24-h urine collections (compared with the original CER of <350 mg/day or >3,500 mg/day) on the association of the CER with mortality. To allow for these secondary analyses, we used a recently developed CER estimation formula (12).

Statistical computations were performed using SPSS, version 18.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). A P value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the 1,872 patients included in the current study matched the characteristics of the overall RENAAL and IDNT population (Table 1). The mean age of patients included in the current study was 60 ± 8 years and the median CER was 1,407 (total range, 400–3,406) mg/day. Patients with the highest CER were younger, more often black, taller, and heavier, and thus had a higher BMI (Table 1). Patients with a higher CER also had lower systolic blood pressure (BP) but higher diastolic BP, higher hemoglobin levels, higher eGFR, diabetes for a relatively shorter amount of time, and less often a history of CVD. Albuminuria was positively associated with the CER.

Table 1.

Characteristics of all RENAAL and IDNT study participants, characteristics of participants included in the current study, and characteristics of included participants according to sex-stratified tertiles of the CER

graphic file with name 1489tbl1.jpg

We performed multivariable linear regression analyses to identify independent determinants of the CER (Table 2). The model with the best fit included BSA (R2 = 0.367), whereas models including BMI (R2 = 0.330) or both height and weight (R2 = 0.364) had lower fits. BSA, hemoglobin, black race, and albuminuria were positive independent determinants of the CER, whereas female sex and age were inverse independent determinants of the CER.

Table 2.

Determinants of the CER in a multivariable linear regression analysis

graphic file with name 1489tbl2.jpg

During a median follow-up of 36 (29–45) months, 300 patients died (85 in RENAAL and 215 in IDNT). Of these, 177 deaths were classified as of cardiovascular origin. In a Kaplan-Meier analysis for sex-stratified tertiles of the CER, the risk for all-cause mortality increased according to decreasing CER (P < 0.001 across tertiles) (Supplementary Fig. 1).

In a univariate Cox regression analysis, survival worsened across decreasing tertiles of the CER (HR 1.56 [95% CI 1.13–2.16], P = 0.006 for the middle tertile vs. the highest tertile; 2.66 [1.98–3.57], P < 0.001 for the lowest tertile vs. the highest tertile). In multivariable Cox regression analyses for the CER as a continuous variable, the CER remained strongly and inversely associated with all-cause mortality, independent of body dimensions, classical cardiovascular risk factors, renal function, and diabetic parameters (Table 3). Furthermore, in the final model, the CER was independently and inversely associated with both cardiovascular (0.49 [0.33–0.73], P < 0.001) and noncardiovascular mortality (0.27 [0.17–0.42], P < 0.001).

Table 3.

Cox regression analyses for doubling of the CER as determinant of all-cause mortality

graphic file with name 1489tbl3.jpg

In sensitivity analyses, we respectively excluded patients who deviated >50% or >30% from the estimated CER, as calculated by anthropometric data (12). If patients with a deviation of >50% from the estimated value of the CER (n = 116) were excluded, 1,756 patients remained for analysis. If patients with a deviation of >30% from the estimated value of the CER (n = 450) were excluded, 1,422 patients remained for analysis. Both exclusions did not materially change the association of the CER with all-cause mortality (full model HRs of 0.34 [95% CI 0.23–0.50], P < 0.001, and 0.36 [0.19–0.70], P = 0.002, respectively).

To visualize the number of patients at risk in relation to the risk for end points, the distribution of the CER as a histogram along with the curve showing HRs over the range of CERs is shown in Fig. 1. This figure illustrates that the CER-associated risk for mortality is not limited to extremes of the CER but that risk varies over the full range of the CER.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Histogram of the CER combined with HRs for all-cause mortality plotted over the total range of the CER (smoothed second-order polynomial curve). The gray bars represent the number of patients, and the black line represents the smoothed HR plot over the CER range.

CONCLUSIONS

In this post hoc analysis in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy, the CER was a strong inverse determinant of risk for all-cause mortality, with a more than twofold increased risk for mortality per halving of the CER. As visualized in Fig. 1, an increased risk was already present in patients with a CER around median values, indicating that a large part of the population carried an increased risk in association with a lower CER. To our knowledge, this is the first time the CER was reported to be inversely associated with mortality in diabetic patients.

In the current study, the HR for mortality increased more than twofold per halving of the CER. In a prior study in the general population, the HR increased about twofold per halving of the CER (3). Muscle mass is associated with insulin resistance, nutritional status, and physical activity. As these factors are even more important in diabetic patients, this would also explain the strong inverse association of the CER with mortality in this specific population when compared with the general population.

Several mechanisms can be hypothesized to underlie the inverse association of the CER with mortality in this diabetic population. First of all, muscle mass may materially determine insulin resistance, which is linked to adverse outcomes (3,4). In conditions of impaired insulin production or increased insulin resistance, glucose levels become more dependent on uptake in muscles (15). As such, muscle mass is an important determinant of insulin resistance. Unfortunately, more detailed markers for insulin sensitivity, such as homeostasis model assessment or fasting insulin levels, were not available in our study.

Another potential explanation for the inverse association of the CER with mortality might lie in protein malnutrition. Malnutrition leads to muscle wasting in a variety of conditions, including chronic kidney disease and diabetes (5,7,8), and is associated with adverse outcomes (16,17). In fact, this association may also be influenced by insulin resistance. Apart from its effect on glucose uptake, insulin promotes protein uptake and inhibits proteolysis in muscles (18). As such, resistance to the physiological actions of insulin may lead not only to impaired glucose metabolism but also to muscle wasting and loss of muscle mass (7).

Furthermore, the CER may reflect physical activity and, as such, good health. Interestingly, body weight was inversely associated with mortality in diabetes, possibly related to the age-related loss of lean muscle mass (19). It has extensively been shown that physical activity not only increases muscle mass and strength but also improves insulin sensitivity (20), BP (21), fat mass (22), HDL cholesterol (23), and, ultimately, mortality (24,25). Additionally, increased physical activity and higher muscle mass are associated with lower inflammatory parameters (26), which are associated with a worse outcome in diabetic nephropathy (27). Unfortunately, data on inflammatory markers such as CRP were not available for our study.

Our results underpin the importance of 24-h urine collections for gathering clinically relevant parameters. Although not considered the gold standard for the assessment of muscle mass (that would be computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), a 24-h urine collection is a cheap and relatively fast measurement for various relevant parameters, including proteinuria and sodium excretion (reflecting sodium intake), in addition to the CER. Although in Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines, spot morning urine is now proposed for the assessment of albuminuria and proteinuria (28), 24-h urine collection is deemed more accurate (29,30) and allows for the measurement of additional nutritional parameters in addition to the CER.

For the estimation of muscle mass, midarm and midthigh circumference measurements are sometimes considered, but they do not properly reflect muscle mass as measurements may be obscured by edema, intramuscular fat, and other tissues. It has been shown that even computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging may suffer from these drawbacks (31,32).

Urine collection errors are considered a major drawback of 24-h urine collection data. To minimize the effect of inaccurate collections on our results, we performed additional sensitivity analyses. Based on a formula developed by Ix et al. (12), whereby the CER is estimated according to anthropometric data, patients who deviated >50 or >30% from their estimated value were deemed inaccurate collections and excluded in the sensitivity analyses. This did not materially change our results, which indicates that collection errors did not significantly influence our main findings. However, errors in urine collections cannot be fully accounted for because extremely low or high values of the CER may reflect collection errors but may also reflect extremes in body composition. Furthermore, 24-h urine collections were only available in 58% of the patients in the trials under investigation. This could have induced some bias, but if characteristics of the patients included in the current study were compared with the overall population included in the RENAAL and IDNT trials, no important differences were apparent.

To establish the causes of the association of the CER with mortality, the assessment of the determinants of the CER is useful, as this might guide the search for the causal pathways. Data on insulin resistance and physical activity, unfortunately, were unavailable. Since insulin resistance and physical activity may play an important role in the relationship of the CER with mortality, the roles of insulin resistance and physical activity need to be further elucidated.

In conclusion, the CER, which serves as a surrogate marker for muscle mass, was inversely associated with all-cause mortality in diabetic patients with nephropathy, thus indicating that the CER can be used as a risk marker in this population. It would be of interest to see whether halting the loss of muscle mass seen in diabetes (8) by physical activity may improve outcomes. Further research is needed to gain more insight into the exact relationship between muscle mass and mortality.

Acknowledgments

The RENAAL trial was funded by Merck and the IDNT trial by Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute and Sanofi-Synthelabo. D.d.Z. received financial support from Merck for his participation in the Steering Committee. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

The funding sources were involved in the data collection but not in the analysis or interpretation of data or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

S.J.S. and A.J.K. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. S.J.L.B., S.S., E.E., and D.d.Z. reviewed the manuscript. G.N. and H.J.L.H. provided substantial intellectual contribution by revising the final version of the paper. S.J.S. and A.J.K. are the guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

This study was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, San Diego, California, 31 October–4 November 2012.

The authors acknowledge the supportive role of all RENAAL and IDNT investigators, support staff, and participating patients.

Footnotes

This article contains Supplementary Data online at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2337/dc12-1545/-/DC1.

References

  • 1.Dinneen SF, Gerstein HC. The association of microalbuminuria and mortality in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A systematic overview of the literature. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1413–1418 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oterdoom LH, de Vries AP, Gansevoort RT, de Jong PE, Gans RO, Bakker SJ. Fasting insulin is a stronger cardiovascular risk factor in women than in men. Atherosclerosis 2009;203:640–646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Oterdoom LH, Gansevoort RT, Schouten JP, de Jong PE, Gans RO, Bakker SJ. Urinary creatinine excretion, an indirect measure of muscle mass, is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the general population. Atherosclerosis 2009;207:534–540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oterdoom LH, van Ree RM, de Vries AP, et al. Urinary creatinine excretion reflecting muscle mass is a predictor of mortality and graft loss in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 2008;86:391–398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tajiri Y, Kato T, Nakayama H, Yamada K. Reduction of skeletal muscle, especially in lower limbs, in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients with insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk factors. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2010;8:137–142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pupim LB, Flakoll PJ, Majchrzak KM, Aftab Guy DL, Stenvinkel P, Ikizler TA. Increased muscle protein breakdown in chronic hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int 2005;68:1857–1865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Siew ED, Pupim LB, Majchrzak KM, Shintani A, Flakoll PJ, Ikizler TA. Insulin resistance is associated with skeletal muscle protein breakdown in non-diabetic chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2007;71:146–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sun Z, Liu L, Liu N, Liu Y. Muscular response and adaptation to diabetes mellitus. Front Biosci 2008;13:4765–4794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. RENAAL Study Investigators The losartan renal protection study—rationale, study design and baseline characteristics of RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan). J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2000;1:328–335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Collaborative Study Group Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001;345:851–860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Packham DK, Alves TP, Dwyer JP, et al. Relative incidence of ESRD versus cardiovascular mortality in proteinuric type 2 diabetes and nephropathy: results from the DIAMETRIC (Diabetes Mellitus Treatment for Renal Insufficiency Consortium) database. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;59:75–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ix JH, Wassel CL, Stevens LA, et al. Equations to estimate creatinine excretion rate: the CKD epidemiology collaboration. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;6:184–191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:604–612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dubois D, Dubois EF. Clinical calorimetry. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 1916;17:863–871 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kalyani RR, Metter EJ, Ramachandran R, Chia CW, Saudek CD, Ferrucci L. Glucose and insulin measurements from the oral glucose tolerance test and relationship to muscle mass. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012;67:74–81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gale CR, Martyn CN, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Grip strength, body composition, and mortality. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:228–235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Metter EJ, Talbot LA, Schrager M, Conwit RA. Arm-cranking muscle power and arm isometric muscle strength are independent predictors of all-cause mortality in men. J Appl Physiol 2004;96:814–821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Flakoll PJ, Carlson M, Cherrington AC. Physiological action of insulin. In Diabetes Mellitus: A Fundamental and Clinical Text. 2nd ed. Leroith DTS, Olefsky J, Eds. Philadelphia, PA, Williams & Wilkins, 2000, p. 148–161 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carnethon MR, De Chavez PJ, Biggs ML, et al. Association of weight status with mortality in adults with incident diabetes. JAMA 2012;308:581–590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Perseghin G, Price TB, Petersen KF, et al. Increased glucose transport-phosphorylation and muscle glycogen synthesis after exercise training in insulin-resistant subjects. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1357–1362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Whelton SP, Chin A, Xin X, He J. Effect of aerobic exercise on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:493–503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saris WH, Blair SN, van Baak MA, et al. How much physical activity is enough to prevent unhealthy weight gain? Outcome of the IASO 1st Stock Conference and consensus statement. Obes Rev 2003;4:101–114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Durstine JL, Grandjean PW, Davis PG, Ferguson MA, Alderson NL, DuBose KD. Blood lipid and lipoprotein adaptations to exercise: a quantitative analysis. Sports Med 2001;31:1033–1062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wei M, Kampert JB, Barlow CE, et al. Relationship between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in normal-weight, overweight, and obese men. JAMA 1999;282:1547–1553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness attenuates the effects of the metabolic syndrome on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1092–1097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Golbidi S, Badran M, Laher I. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of exercise in diabetic patients. Exp Diabetes Res 2012;2012:941868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Böger CA, Götz A, Stubanus M, et al. C-reactive protein as predictor of death in end-stage diabetic nephropathy: role of peripheral arterial disease. Kidney Int 2005;68:217–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.KDOQI. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2007;49(2 Suppl. 2):S12–S154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hong YH, Dublin N, Razack AH, Mohd MA, Husain R. Twenty-four hour and spot urine metabolic evaluations: correlations versus agreements. Urology 2010;75:1294–1298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lambers Heerspink HJ, Brantsma AH, de Zeeuw D, Bakker SJ, de Jong PE, Gansevoort RT, PREVEND Study Group Albuminuria assessed from first-morning-void urine samples versus 24-hour urine collections as a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:897–905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Goodpaster BH, Stenger VA, Boada F, et al. Skeletal muscle lipid concentration quantified by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:748–754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Watt MJ, Heigenhauser GJ, Spriet LL. Intramuscular triacylglycerol utilization in human skeletal muscle during exercise: is there a controversy? J Appl Physiol 2002;93:1185–1195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Diabetes Care are provided here courtesy of American Diabetes Association

RESOURCES