Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 16;20(3):203–212. doi: 10.1007/s10140-012-1102-8

Table 4.

Diagnostic accuracy for perfusion parameters for qualitative interpretation before and after excluding lesions not found on the computer-generated lesion maps

Qualitative evaluation only (%) Qualitative analysis and computer lesion maps (%)
CBV
 Study sensitivity 30 (0.95 CI 14–53) 30 (0.95 CI 14–53)
 Study specificity 87 (0.95 CI 74–95) 91 (0.95 CI 79–97)
 Negative predictive value 72 (0.95 CI 58–83) 73 (0.95 CI 60–83)
 Positive predictive value 54 (0.95 CI 26–80) 64 (0.95 CI 32–88)
CBF
 Study sensitivity 48 (0.95 CI 27–69) 48 (0.95 CI 27–69)
 Study specificity 83 (0.95 CI 69–92) 89 (0.95 CI 76–96)
 Negative predictive value 76 (0.95 CI 62–87) 78 (0.95 CI 64–88)
 Positive predictive value 58 (0.95 CI 34–79) 69 (0.95 CI 41–88)
MTT
 Study sensitivity 61 (0.95 CI 39–80) 61 (0.95 CI 39–80)
 Study specificity 68 (0.95 CI 53–80) 77 (0.95 CI 62–87)
 Negative predictive value 78 (0.95 CI 62–89) 80 (0.95 CI 65–90)
 Positive predictive value 48 (0.95 CI 30–67) 56 (0.95 CI 35–75)
TTP
 Study sensitivity 61 (0.95 CI 39–80) 61 (0.95 CI 39–80)
 Study specificity 66 (0.95 CI 51–79) 77 (0.95 CI 62–87)
 Negative predictive value 78 (0.95 CI 61–89) 80 (0.95 CI 65–90)
 Positive predictive value 47 (0.95 CI 29–65) 56 (0.95 CI 35–75)