. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 24.

Published in final edited form as: Clin Chim Acta. 2012 Jun 8;414:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.06.003

Table 1. Comparison of the multiwell plate-adapted method for measurement of ROM using DEPPD oxidation in the presence of Fe²⁺ to results obtained with the commercially available FORT kit.

	Within day	Between day

Method
FORT kit (Carr Units) (Low)	273 ± 31	270 ± 23
CV (%)	11	8.6
(High)	495 ± 5	485 ± 16
CV (%)	1.0	3.2
Overall CV (%, n=4)	6.0	5.8
Microplate (Carr Units) (Low)	295 ± 21	288 ± 20
CV (%)	7.1	6.8
(High)	478 ± 22	465 ± 19
CV (%)	5.0	4.8
Overall CV (%, n=4)	6.5	5.3
Microplate value as percentage of FORT value (n=4)	101 ± 4	99 ± 0.5

Table 1. Comparison of the multiwell plate-adapted method for measurement of ROM using DEPPD oxidation in the presence of Fe2+ to results obtained with the commercially available FORT kit.