Table 2.
Logistic regression investigating the relationship between smoking level (smokers versus nonsmokers) and type of dietary restriction
Light Smokers vs. Nonsmokers | Heavy Smokers vs. Nonsmokers | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
B | OR | 95% CI | P | B | OR | 95% CI | P | |
Unadjusted Model: | ||||||||
Healthy Restrictions | −.07 | .93 | (.75, 1.15) | .50 | −.55 | .58 | (.44, .77) | .0001 |
Unhealthy Restrictions | .98 | 2.67 | (2.08, 3.43) | <.0001 | 1.07 | 2.92 | (2.20, 3.87) | <.0001 |
Adjusted Model: | ||||||||
Healthy restrictions | −.21 | .81 | (.64, 1.03) | .082 | −.44 | .64 | (.47, .88) | .006 |
Unhealthy restrictions | .85 | 2.35 | (1.77, 3.11) | <.001 | 1.00 | 2.72 | (1.94, 3.84) | <.0001 |
Gender | .07 | 1.14 | (.87, 1.49) | .335 | −.16 | .73 | (.59, .90) | .004 |
Underweight | −.47 | .62 | (.38, 1.04) | .069 | −.31 | .73 | (.51, 1.05) | .090 |
Overweight | .28 | 1.32 | (.98, 1.78) | .068 | .15 | 1.16 | (.92, 1.48) | .214 |
Grade: | ||||||||
9th | −.29 | .49 | (.37, .66) | .0008 | −.47 | .45 | (.30, .66) | <.0001 |
10th | −.27 | .50 | (.37, .66) | .0021 | −.10 | .64 | (.44, .93) | .3476 |
11th | .15 | .77 | (.58, 1.02) | .0036 | .23 | .89 | (.62, 1.28) | .0288 |