Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 16;18(2):261–328. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2012.650582

Table 5.

Prey, sediments, and seawater tpah data for the Harlequin Duck risk model.a,b

A) PREY TISSUES (ng·g−1 dry weight)
Oiled-Site Prey TPAH
Reference-Site Prey TPAH
Prey Category Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size
Gastropods 23.04 8.09 26 20.76 8.42 7
Mussels 45.87 28.99 96 33.11 17.99 27
Clams 72.08 68.88 54 42.69 22.14 12
Crustaceans 25.54 4.80 15 31.07 7.85 4
Fish eggs 53.07 3.09 12 54.15 3.87 23
Other inverts 107.65 102.43 26 47.82 24.25 6
B) SEDIMENTS (ng·g−1)
Oiled-Site Sediments TPAH
Reference-Site Sediments TPAH
Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size

63.21 132.37 51 28.27 33.27 27
C) SEAWATER (ng·L−1)c
Oiled-Site Seawater TPAH
Reference Seawater TPAH
Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size

8.48 3.57 23 7.62 1.54 12
a

See text for data sources; all data available at http://www.valdezsciences.com/polycyclic_aromatic_hydrocarbon.cfm

b

All PAH data in the base risk assessment model substitute ½ MDL for each non-detect analysis; some sensitivity analyses were conducted using other substitutions for non-detects; see text for details.

c

Oiled seawater samples were collected off initially oiled shorelines that were found to have SSOR. Reference seawater samples were collected off initially oiled shorelines that did not have SSOR, as no seawater samples exist for never-oiled shorelines.