Skip to main content
. 2013 May 7;2013:185259. doi: 10.1155/2013/185259

Table 6.

Effects of GE on the expression of genes in adipose tissue.

Genes investigated ND240 HFD60 HFD120 HFD240 HFDMET
Lipolysis
 ATGL 1.34 ± 0.34 1.78 ± 0.67a 6.05 ± 0.42c 5.69 ± 0.34c 3.84 ± 0.98b
 HSL 1.98 ± 0.07 2.99 ± 0.17a 6.73 ± 0.42c 6.54 ± 0.32c 4.63 ± 1.16b

Differentiation
 LPL −1.05 ± 0.09 −1.93 ± 0.18a −1.12 ± 0.42b −1.17 ± 0.47b −2.22 ± 0.99a
 PPAR-γ −1.69 ± 0.19 −2.08 ± 0.69a −1.69 ± 0.48ab −1.02 ± 0.36c −1.07 ± 0.16c
 SREBP-1c −1.27 ± 0.65 −1.01 ± 0.16c −3.10 ± 0.44a −2.25 ± 0.30ab −2.30 ± 1.13ab

Results are expressed as fold variation over the appropriate control groups; ND240 indicates fold increase over ND (normal diet control group), and HFD60, HFD120, HFD240, and HFDMET indicate fold increase over HFD (high-fat diet control group). Fold variations less than one were expressed as negative numbers (e.g., a fold variation of 0.50 is expressed as −2.00). Values expressed are means ± S.D of triplicate measurements. Statistical significance was calculated based on the mean ΔCT values by DMRT for only mice fed with high-fat diet with or without GE. For same gene with various treatment groups, superscripts in the different bar with different alphabets (a–c) were significantly different (P < 0.05). Superscripts with same alphabets were not significantly different between the treated groups (P > 0.05).