Table 3.
Association analysis between GRS and IBD and its subtype CD and UC.
Diseases | GRS | Gender | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
OR (95% CI) | P value | OR | P value | |
IBD | ||||
All samples | 1.66 (1.46–1.90) | 7.86E-14 | 0.59 (0.49–0.71) | 1.31E-08 |
Female samples | 1.43 (1.25–1.64) | 2.08E-07 | – | – |
Male samples | 2.08 (1.68–2.60) | 4.57E-11 | – | – |
CD | ||||
All samples | 1.82 (1.57–2.11) | 7.85E-16 | 0.53 (0.43–0.65) | 4.07E-09 |
Female samples | 1.68 (1.41–2.00) | 8.15E-09 | – | – |
Male samples | 2.04 (1.67–2.51) | 9.86E-12 | – | – |
UC | ||||
All samples | 1.37 (1.20–1.57) | 2.74E-06 | 0.68 (0.55–0.85) | 6.1E-4 |
Female samples | 1.51 (1.26–1.81) | 9.76E-06 | – | – |
Male samples | 1.66 (1.32–2.11) | 1.63E-05 | – | – |