Table 4. List of Some of the Impurities Identified in the pH 10.5 Extract of Methamphetamine Synthesized by the Reductive Amination Routea.
no. | RT | impurity extracted at pH 10.5 | semiquantitative concentration mg/mL | intra-batch (n = 6) RSD | inter-batch (n = 20) RSD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 7.034 | Acetic acid | 6 × 10−3 | 55% | 179% |
2 | 9.408 | Amphetamine | 5 × 10−2 | 49% | 119% |
3 | 10.715 | N-(1-Methyl-2-phenylethylidene)methenamine | 5 × 10−1 | 15% | 52% |
4 | 11.06 | Dimethylamphetamine (DMA) | 3 × 10−2 | 53% | 98% |
5 | 13.664 | N-Formylamphetamine | 3 × 10−3 | 106% | 109% |
6 | 14.445 | Bibenzyl | 6 × 10−3 | 144% | 112% |
7 | 14.584 | N-Formylmethamphetamine* | 2 × 10−2 | 103% | 77% |
8 | 15.034 | N-Acetylmethamphetamine* | 2 × 10−2 | 93% | 142% |
9 | 16.289 | Dibenzylketone* | 1 × 10−3 | 100% | 196% |
10 | 17.92 | 3,4-Diphenyl-3-buten-2-one* | 7 × 10−3 | 166% | 154% |
11 | 18.014 | α-Benzyl-N-methylphenethylamine* | 8 × 10−4 | 129% | 164% |
12 | 18.119 | Benzylmethamphetamine | 2 × 10−3 | 138% | 162% |
13 | 18.192 | 3,4-Diphenyl-3-buten-2-one* | 4 × 10−3 | 131% | 129% |
14 | 18.453 | N-β-(Phenylisopropyl)benzyl methyl ketimine* | 6 × 10−2 | 64% | 77% |
15 | 18.83 | N-Methyldiphenethylamine* | 2 × 10−3 | 120% | 153% |
16 | 20.189 | N-Benzoylamphetamine | 4 × 10−3 | 51% | 82% |
17 | 20.409 | N-Benzoylmethamphetamine | 1 × 10−2 | 92% | 118% |
18 | 21.046 | 2,6-Dimethyl-3,5-diphenylpyridine* | 3 × 10−2 | 82% | 173% |
19 | 21.214 | Pyridine 7 and 14* | 2 × 10−2 | 76% | 65% |
20 | 22.385 | N,N-Di-(β-phenylisopropyl)formamide | 5 × 10−3 | 113% | 89% |
21 | 23.253 | N-Methyl-N-(1-methyl-2-phenylethyl)-2-phenylacetamide* | 4 × 10−3 | 87% | 108% |
RSDs were calculated using peak areas normalized to the sum of the CHAMP target impurities present in the relevant chromatogram. Route specific impurities for the reductive amination route are not present in the basic extract. CHAMP target impurities are marked with an asterisk (*).