Skip to main content
. 2013 May 28;63(611):e386–e392. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X668177

Table 2.

Changes in attendance rate (primary outcome) after the introduction of referral management in each group: linear regression and ARIMA regression with autocorrelation correction

Group Referral-management approach Mean attendance rate before start of referral management per 1000 persons per month Mean attendance rate after start of referral management per 1000 persons per month Change in attendance rate (95% CI) associated with start of referral management per 1000 persons per montha Change in attendance rate (95% CI) associated with start of referral management (ARIMA) per 1000 persons per montha
1 Internal peer review 14.9 15.6 0.76c (0.12 to 1.40) 0.72 (–0.18 to 1.61)
2 Internal peer review 14.0 15.2 1.20c (0.60 to 1.80) 0.80 (–0.11 to 1.71)
3 Referral-management centre 15.1 16.1 1.10c (0.67 to 1.53) 1.05c (0.46 to 1.64)
4b Referral-management centre 14.3 14.6 0.41c (0.02 to 0.79)
5 Referral-management centre 17.0 17.3 0.27 (–0.36 to 0.90) 0.27 (–0.37 to 0.90)

aMay not equal the difference between mean attendance rate before and after start of referral management because of the effect of the incremental introduction of referral management.

b

Autocorrelation was not significant in group 4; therefore, an ARIMA model was not used in this group.

c

Statistically significant at 5% level.