Table 2.
Group | Referral-management approach | Mean attendance rate before start of referral management per 1000 persons per month | Mean attendance rate after start of referral management per 1000 persons per month | Change in attendance rate (95% CI) associated with start of referral management per 1000 persons per montha | Change in attendance rate (95% CI) associated with start of referral management (ARIMA) per 1000 persons per montha |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Internal peer review | 14.9 | 15.6 | 0.76c (0.12 to 1.40) | 0.72 (–0.18 to 1.61) |
2 | Internal peer review | 14.0 | 15.2 | 1.20c (0.60 to 1.80) | 0.80 (–0.11 to 1.71) |
3 | Referral-management centre | 15.1 | 16.1 | 1.10c (0.67 to 1.53) | 1.05c (0.46 to 1.64) |
4b | Referral-management centre | 14.3 | 14.6 | 0.41c (0.02 to 0.79) | |
5 | Referral-management centre | 17.0 | 17.3 | 0.27 (–0.36 to 0.90) | 0.27 (–0.37 to 0.90) |
aMay not equal the difference between mean attendance rate before and after start of referral management because of the effect of the incremental introduction of referral management.
Autocorrelation was not significant in group 4; therefore, an ARIMA model was not used in this group.
Statistically significant at 5% level.