Skip to main content
. 2013 May 28;63(611):e393–e400. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X668186

Table 4.

Stage 1 and 2 validation of brief FHQ using pooled data

Condition Question number(s) Sensitivity, % (95% CI) [n] Specificity, % (95% CI) [n] Positive likelihood ratio Negative likelihood ratio Positive predictive value, % False-positive rate, %
Diabetes 3 98 (95 to 99%)
[208/213]
94 (92 to 95)
[854/913]
15.11a 0.03a 77.9 0.6
Ischaemic heart disease 2 93 (87 to 96)
[141/152]
81 (79 to 84)
[804/990]
4.94b 0.09a 43.1 1.3
Breast cancer 6 or 8 81 (67 to 91)
[39/48]
83 (80 to 85)
[598/723]
4.70 0.22 23.8 1.5
Colorectal cancer 10 or 11 96 (80 to 99)
[24/25]
88 (86 to 89)
[976/1114]
7.75b 0.05a 14.9 0.1
a

Strong clinical significance.

b

Modest clinical significance.