Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2013 Mar;16(1):3–12.

Table 2b. Racial and ethnic differences in total mental health care expenditures among those with positive expenditures by quantile.

Comparing White Expenditure to Predicted Minority Mental Health Expenditure using Black/Latino Coefficients and White Covariate Distributions

Quantile Regression Quantile

White Black B-W Disparity %Disparity Latino L-W Disparity %Disparity


Estimate Estimate Estimate
Full covariates model 50% 389.79 377.47 12.32 3% 372.63 17.16 4%
75% 997.81 1067.00 −69.19 −7% 1022.37 −24.56 −2%
95% 3436.47 3715.49 −279.01 −8% 3883.02 −446.55 −13%
HS covariates only model 50% 394.78 384.62 10.16 3% 310.28 84.50 21% *
75% 992.98 1207.17 −214.19 −22% 877.76 115.22 12%
95% 3613.39 5578.72 −1965.33 −54% 3449.86 163.53 5%

Source: 2004–2008 MEPS (n=83,878)

*

p<.10

In addition to race/ethnicity indicator variables, quantile regression models using need only covariates adjust for health and mental health status variables (self-reported mental health and health status, mental and physical components of the SF-12 scale, K6 scale of severe psychological distress, PHQ-2 depression scale, list of chronic conditions, BMI, age, gender. Full covariate models additionally include socioeconomic status variables (poverty status, education, and marital status), and interactions between race/ethnicity and education and income.