Table 3.
Quantile regression coefficients from model of mental health care expenditure testing differential response by race, insurance, education, income, and language
95th percentile | 97.5 percentile | 99th percentile | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Black-White Difference | ||||
Insurance | Private₪ | −2.896 ** | −1.603*** | −1.304*** |
Public | −1.009 ***,††† | 0.112††† | −0.112††† | |
Uninsured | −0.823 **,††† | −1.798***,††† | −1.752***,†† | |
Education | < HS Grad₪ | −2.896 ** | −1.603*** | −1.304*** |
HS Grad | −2.757 ***,††† | −1.007***,††† | −0.531††† | |
Any College | −3.618 *** | −1.544***,†† | −0.948**,†† | |
College Grad | −2.833 ***,††† | −0.843**,††† | −0.459††† | |
Income | <FPL₪ | −2.896 ** | −1.603*** | −1.304*** |
100–125% FPL | −3.023 ***,††† | −0.769††† | −0.879††† | |
125–200% FPL | −3.199 *** | −1.880***,††† | −0.782 | |
200–400% FPL | −2.779 *** | −1.922*** | −1.439*** | |
400%+ FPL | −3.367 *** | −1.706***,†† | −1.305*** | |
Latino-White Difference | ||||
Insurance | Private₪ | −1.888 *** | −1.352** | −0.819** |
Public | −2.100 ***,††† | −1.569***,††† | −1.482***,†† | |
Uninsured | −0.6361 ** | −2.632***,††† | −1.648***,†† | |
Education | < HS Grad₪ | −1.888 *** | −1.352** | −0.819** |
HS Grad | −1.547 **,††† | −0.489††† | 0.078††† | |
Any College | −2.421 *** | −1.026***,††† | −0.181††† | |
College Grad | −1.724 ***,††† | −0.715 | −0.094††† | |
Income | <FPL₪ | −1.888 *** | −1.352*** | −0.819** |
100–125% FPL | −2.225 ***,††† | −1.393***,††† | −1.141**,††† | |
125–200% FPL | −2.054 *** | −1.399*** | −0.973** | |
200–400% FPL | −1.733 *** | −1.394*** | −1.193*** | |
400%+ FPL | −2.307 *** | −1.580*** | −0.694†† |
Source: 2004–2008 MEPS (n=83,878)
On log scale - proportional effects (no risk ratios)
In addition to race/ethnicity indicator variables, quantile regression models adjust for age, gender, health and mental health status variables (self-reported mental health and health status, mental and physical components of the SF-12 scale, K6 scale of severe psychological distress, PHQ-2 depression scale, list of chronic conditions, BMI), socioeconomic status variables (poverty status, education, and marital status), and interactions between race/ethnicity and education and income.
Indicates referent group used in the expenditure model. Coefficients presented for these groups are estimated using linear combinations.
Significant disparity at α=0.05 and α=0.01 levels
Significantly different from prior row’s group (same quintile) at α=0.05 and α=0.01 levels