Skip to main content
. 2013 May 23;8(5):e62943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062943

Table 1. Disparity index values calculated from pairwise comparisons among neuropteridan species included in this study.

Taxa PCG123 PCG12 PCG1 PCG2 PCG3
Sum Mean Sum Mean Sum Mean Sum Mean Sum Mean
Ascaloptynx 50.08 5.01 24.60 2.46 24.85 2.49 6.26 0.63 35.90 3.60
Apochrysa 50.76 5.01 15.05 1.51 18.63 1.86 3.58 0.36 57.43 5.74
Chrysoperla 56.15 5.61 15.27 1.53 24.62 2.46 3.67 0.37 75.05 7.51
Corydalus 62.00 6.20 22.43 2.24 28.27 2.83 6.79 0.68 86.54 8.65
Ditaxis 43.72 4.37 17.51 1.75 19.15 1.92 4.27 0.43 37.73 3.77
Libelloides 95.45 9.55 47.43 4.74 35.10 3.51 3.98 0.40 103.37 10.34
Mongoloraphidia 65.74 6.47 31.98 3.20 50.17 5.02 26.41 2.61 29.24 2.92
Polystoechotes 56.27 5.62 12.97 1.30 20.78 2.08 4.46 0.45 91.73 9.17
Protohermes 41.42 4.14 15.96 1.60 18.23 1.82 6.93 0.93 38.64 3.86
Thyridosmylus 36.48 3.65 13.30 1.33 18.34 1.83 4.39 0.44 35.07 3.51
Sialis 27.66 2.77 11.42 1.14 12.38 1.24 3.37 0.34 26.51 2.65

‘Sum’ indicates the sum of all I D calculated for a particular taxon, and ‘Mean’ indicates the average of I D for that taxon. Taxa with high I D-values have a significantly different base compositional bias from the rest of the species. Numeric values shown next to PCG (i.e. PCG1) represent codon positions. The values shown here highlight the level of base compositional heterogeneity in our dataset.