Skip to main content
. 2013 May 9;10:31. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-10-31

Table 1.

Results of direct curve fitting of the exponential and the Gompertzian growth models to tumour volume data from two patients

Patient (year of birth)
Tumour type
Tumour (V cm3)
Number of data points
Growth model
Exponential
Gompertzian
        SGR0(%/day) Year of formation r2 SGR0(%/day) λ (1/d) Year of formation r2
1 (1952)
Liver metastases from a primary midgut carcinoid
A (614)
8
0.14
1947
0.972
1.1
0.0004
1983
0.988
B (171)
8
0.15
1956
0.992
0.2
0
1956
0.989
C (8)
3
0.22
1971
1.000
0.3
0
1976
0.954
D (9)
4
0.27
1978
0.997
1.3
0.0005
1991
1.000
E (4)
2
0.33
1982
1.000
-
-
-
-
F (3)
2
0.31
1982
1.000
-
-
-
-
2 (1941)
Lung metastases from a primary renal cell carcinoma
A (82)
3
0.32
1973
0.998
3.8
0.0014
1992
1.000
 
 
B (635)
19
0.24
1968
0.992
0.5
0.0001
1977
0.993
 
 
C (489)
12
0.33
1976
0.939
0.4
0
1977
0.938
 
 
D (54)
7
0.38
1980
0.986
1.8
0.0006
1991
0.990
 
 
E (8)
6
0.14
1953
0.798
0.1
0
1953
0.791
 
 
F (11)
5
0.22
1970
0.946
0.4
0.0001
1978
0.944
    G (7) 4 0.39 1983 0.998 0.5 0 1987 0.970

SGR0, r, and λ are the SGR value at the time of tumour formation, the correlation coefficient, and the Gompertzian growth deceleration constant, respectively. Curve fitting of the Gompertzian model was not possible for liver tumours E and F because too few data points were available. V: Maximum tumour volume.