Skip to main content
. 2013 May 17;6:19. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-6-19

Table 3.

Mean values (SD) and percentage change for the medial and lateral heel at week 0 (N = 30)

Medial heel
 
Peak pressure (kPa)
Maximum force (%BW)
Contact area (cm2)
Insert Mean (SD) % change p-value Mean (SD) % change p-value Mean (SD) % change p-value
Shoe only (control)
215.5 (52.3)
n/a
n/a
38.2 (6.4)
n/a
n/a
19.7 (1.8)
n/a
n/a
Customised foot orthosis
187.8 (40.3)
−13%*^
<0.001
35.5 (6.4)
−7%*
0.004
20.0 (1.7)
+1%
0.495
Contoured polyethylene
204.5 (48.8)
−5%#+
0.180
35.5 (6.6)
−7%*
0.041
19.7 (1.8)
0%
1.000
Contoured EVA
186.7 (41.9)
−13%*^
<0.001
34.8 (5.7)
−9%*
<0.001
19.9 (1.8)
+1%
0.879
Flat EVA
190.8 (44.8)
−11%*
0.001
35.1 (6.2)
−8%*
0.008
19.9 (1.7)
+1%
0.230
Lateral heel
 
Peak pressure (kPa)
Maximum force (%BW)
Contact area (cm2)
Insert
Mean (SD)
% change
p-value
Mean (SD)
% change
p-value
Mean (SD)
% change
p-value
Shoe only (control)
213.9 (50.5)
n/a
n/a
37.8 (6.7)
n/a
n/a
19.4 (1.8)
n/a
n/a
Customised foot orthosis
198.8 (49.3)
−7%
0.251
40.0 (7.3)
+6%
0.134
19.7 (1.8)
+2%
0.319
Contoured polyethylene
209.3 (46.9)
−2%+
1.000
39.4 (6.9)
+4%
0.470
19.5 (1.8)
+1%
1.000
Contoured EVA
191.8 (39.5)
−10%*^
<0.001
38.6 (6.5)
+2%
1.000
19.7 (1.8)
+2%
0.319
Flat EVA 196.5 (52.3) −8%* 0.015 40.1 (7.2) +6%* 0.036 19.6 (1.8) +1% 0.568

* Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the shoe only condition.

# Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the customised orthosis.

Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the flat EVA sham orthosis.

+ Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the contoured EVA sham orthosis.

^ Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the contoured polyethylene orthosis.