Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 19;14:140. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-140

Table 5.

Validation of prediction model

Risk category Low Intermediate High
Original study group
 
 
 
N=282 n (% of N)
91 (32)
86 (31)
105 (37)
Risk for ‘initial U-RTW’1 predicted by final model % (95% CI)
7.2 (3.2-15.3)
19.3 (11.8-29.3)
34.9 (25.2-46.1)
Observed number: obn obn/n
7/91
18/86
39/105
Observed risk %
7.7
20.9
37.1
Risk for ‘one-year U-RTW’2
9.1 (4.3-18.1)
33.5 (23.4-45.3)
60.6 (49.3-71.0)
predicted by final model % (95% CI)
Observed number: obn obn/n
9/91
29/86
62/105
Observed risk %
10.2
33.7
59.1
Validation study group
 
 
 
N=104 n (% of N)
27 (26)
26 (25)
51 (49)
‘Initial U-RTW’1, observed number: obn obn/n
3/27
5/26
20/51
Observed risk %
11.1
19.2
39.2
‘One-year U-RTW’2, observed number obn/n
7/27
7/19
30/59
Observed risk % 25.9 38.5 58.8

Upper panel: Predicted risks with 95% confidence intervals for unsuccessful return to work (U-RTW) and corresponding observed risks in the original study group.

Lower panel: Observed risks for U-RTW in the validation study group.

1 Not succeeding in working continuously for at least 4 weeks work during the first year after inclusion or registered as unemployed for at least 4 weeks.

2 Not succeeding in working continuously for at least 4 weeks up to the one-year date or registered as unemployed for at least 4 weeks up to the one-year date.

The figures apply for patients with non-specific LBP and patients with radiculopathy who were middle aged (~40 years) and with BMI ~25. Predicted risks for patients with radiculopathy, who were older and/or obese were higher (not shown because of few patients in subgroups, see article text “Small subgroups..”).

CI: Confidence interval.