Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Surgery. 2013 Feb 27;153(6):819–827. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.026

Contemporary Trends in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections in the United States

Charles M Psoinos 1, Julie Flahive 1, Joshua J Shaw 1, YouFu Li 1,2, Sing Chau 1, Jennifer F Tseng 3, Heena P Santry 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC3664142  NIHMSID: NIHMS426989  PMID: 23453328

Abstract

Background

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) are rare, potentially fatal surgical emergencies. We studied a national cohort of patients to determine recent trends in incidence, treatment, and outcomes for NSTI.

Methods

We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998–2010) for patients with a primary diagnosis of NSTI. Temporal trends in patient characteristics, treatment (debridement, amputation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT)), and outcomes were determined using Cochran-Armitage Trend Tests and Linear Regression. To account for trends in case mix (age group, sex, race, insurance, Elixhauser index) or receipt of HBOT on outcomes, multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the independent effect of year of treatment on mortality, any major complication, and length of stay for NSTI.

Results

We identified 56,527 weighted NSTI admissions; incidence ranging from approximately 3,800–5,800 cases annually. The number of cases peaked in 2004 and then decreased for an overall statistically significant decrease between 1998 and 2010 (p<0.0001). The percentage of female patients decreased slightly over time (38.6 to 34.1%, p<0.0001). Patients were increasingly in the 18–34 year old (8.8 to 14.6% p<0.0001) and 50–64 year old age groups (33.2 to 43.5, p<0.0001), Hispanic (6.8 to 10.5%, p<0.0001), obese (8.9 to 24.6%, p<0.0001), and admitted with >3 co-morbidities (14.5 to 39.7%, p<0.0001). The percentage of patients requiring only one surgical debridement increased (43.2 to 46.2%, p<0.0001) while the utilization of HBOT was rare and decreasing (1.6 to 0.8%, p<0.0001). The percentage of patients requiring operative wound closure decreased (23.5 to 20.8%, p<0.0001). Although major complication rates increased (30.9 to 48.2%, p<0.0001), LOS remained stable (18–19 days) and mortality decreased (9.0 to 4.9%, p<0.0001) on univariate analyses. On multivariable analyses each one-year incremental increase in year was associated with a 5% increased odds of complication (OR 1.05), 0.4 times decrease in hospital LOS (coefficient −0.41), and 11% decreased odds of mortality (OR 0.89)

Conclusions

There were significant national trends in patient characteristics and treatment patterns for NSTI between 1998 and 2010. Importantly, though patient acuity worsened and complication rates increased, LOS remained relatively stable and mortality decreased. Improvements in early diagnosis, wound care, and critical care delivery may be the cause.

Keywords: Necrotizing Fasciitis, Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection, Gas Gangrene, Fournier’s gangrene

Introduction

Necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) are a collection of rapidly advancing, often fatal infections of the subcutaneous tissues and fascia. Mortality for NSTI has been reported to range from 21–43% in single center studies[1, 2]. Larger studies have shown a mortality as high as 34%[3] but more recently there appears to have been a decline in mortality to 10–12%[4–6]. These epidemiological studies on NSTIs have provided some data on treatment modalities such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT)[7, 8] and the association between a number of co-morbidities such as chronic alcoholism, obesity, diabetes, and immunocompromised status on the development of NSTIs[9]. Only two of these studies have examined a national cohort of NSTI patients[4, 5].

It appears that the basic principles of treatment for NSTI have remained unchanged over the past several decades. Early diagnosis and treatment have been the only consistently proven predictors of outcomes for NSTI[10, 11]. Aggressive antibiotic therapy with prompt, often serial, surgical debridement of all necrotic tissue is paramount to reduce morbidity and mortality[2, 12]. We undertook this study to examine recent national trends in incidence, treatment, and outcomes for NSTI from a large representative sample of the US population.

Methods

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) (1998–2010) was queried for all patients with a primary diagnosis of NSTI (International Classification of Diagnosis ninth revision [ICD-9] codes 728.86 [necrotizing fasciitis], 040.0 [gas gangrene], or 608.83 [Fournier’s gangrene] and at least one surgical debridement (ICD-9 procedure codes defined in Appendix 1) or at least one amputation (ICD-9 procedure codes defined in Appendix 1). The NIS is a dataset from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and represents the largest all-payer inpatient database in the United States. The NIS contains approximately 8 million admission records per year and represents a 20% stratified sample of all acute care hospital admissions nationally [13].

Appendix 1.

ICD-9 Codes for Diagnosis and Treatment of NSTIs

Variable Name ICD-9 code ICD-9 descriptor

NSTI 728.86 Necrotizing Fasciitis
040.0 Gas gangrene
608.83* Male genital vascular disease NEC

Surgical debridement 86.04, 86.09 Skin and soft tissue incision
86.22 Soft tissue excision and debridement
86.28 Non-excisional debridement of soft tissue
83.09 Soft tissue incision NOS
83.44 Fasciectomy
83.45 Myectomy
83.49 Other soft tissue excision

Amputation 885.0, 885.1† Amputation thumb
886.0, 886.1† Amputation finger
887.0, 887.1† Amputation below elbow, unilateral
887.2, 887.3† Amputation above elbow, unilateral
887.4, 887.5† Amputation arm, unilateral NOS
887.6, 887.7† Amputation arm, bilateral
895.0, 895.1† Amputation toe
896.0, 896.1† Amputation foot, unilateral
896.2, 896.3† Amputation foot, bilateral
897.0, 897.1† Amputation below knee, unilateral
897.2, 897.3† Amputation above knee, unilateral
897.4, 897.5† Amputation leg, unilateral NOS
897.6, 897.7† Amputation leg, bilateral
84.04 disarticulation of wrist
84.06 disarticulation of elbow
84.08 shoulder disarticulation
84.13 disarticulation of ankle
84.16 disarticulation of knee
84.18 disarticulation of hip

HBOT 93.95 Hyperbaric oxygen therapy

Wound care 96.58 Wound catheter irrigation
96.59 Wound irrigation NEC
97.15 Replace wound catheter
97.16 Replace wound pack/drain
93.57 Dressing of wound NEC
93.59 Immobilization/wound attention NEC

Wound closure 86.60 Free skin graft NOS
86.62 Hand skin graft nec
86.65 Heterograft to skin
86.66 Homograft to skin
86.67 Dermal regener graft
86.69 Free skin graft nec
86.70 Pedicle graft/flap nos
83.82 Muscle or fascia graft
*

used by convention for Fournier’s gangrene See Mills, Am J Surg, 2010.

†

paired codes for simple and complicated amputations of the same location respectively

The NIS contains data on patient characteristics including demographics (gender, age, insurance status, and race) and co-morbidities (measured by the Elixhauser Index)[14], hospital characteristics (geographic region, urban vs. rural location, and teaching status), interventions (up to 15 procedures classified), and outcomes (complications recorded in up to 14 secondary diagnoses, length of stay, mortality).

For each year of data, we determined proportions in patient characteristics as well as interventions and outcomes using descriptive statistics. Interventions were classified as debridements, amputations, wound care, wound closure, and HBOT (see Appendix 1). Complications were divided into categories including cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, thromboembolic, renal, and infectious (see Appendix 2). Complications were also measured as a dichotomous variable indicating any major complication and a continuous variable counting the total number of complications out of these six categories. These national point estimates were calculated using the NIS survey weights and sampling frame. Trends over time in these estimates were then determined using the Cochrane-Armitage trend tests for dichotomous variables and linear regression for continuous variables.

Appendix 2.

ICD-9 Codes for Complications

Variable Name ICD-9 code ICD-9 descriptor
Cardiac* 410.00–410.91 Acute myocardial infarction

Pulmonary 507.0 Aspiration pneumonia
481, 482, 482.0–482.9, 485.6 Acute bacterial pneumonia
997.31 Ventilator associated pneumonia
518.81, 518.82, 518.4, 518.5, 514 Respiratory failure
31.1, 31.29 Tracheotomy

Neurologic 431.00–431.91, 433.00–433.91, 434.00–434.91, 436, 437.1 Acute cerebrovascular accident

Thromboembolic 453.4–453.42, 453.8, 453.9 Deep venous thrombosis
451.11, 451.19, 451.81, 451.2 Phlebitis
415.1, 415.11, 415.19 Pulmonary embolism
415.0 Acute cor pulmonale

Renal 584.5–584.9 Acute renal failure
39.95 Insertion of short term dialysis catheter

Infectious† 771.82, 599.0, 996.64, 996.65 Urinary tract infection
999.31 Catheter-associated bloodstream infection
*

Excludes 410.42 and 410.72

†

Excludes pneumonia and skin/soft tissue infection

In order to determine if observed epidemiologic trends in outcomes were due to simultaneous trends in case mix or receipt of HBOT, we also conducted multivariable analyses of all patients in our cohort to determine predictors of mortality, any major complication, and LOS for NSTI. Co-variates in the model included year of treatment, age group, sex, race, insurance, Elixhauser index, and HBOT treatment. The models for mortality and LOS also included total major complications. The model for LOS included only those patients who survived hospitalization.

All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Inc, Cary NC). P-value <0.05 for trend tests and co-efficients in multivariable models were considered significant. This study was deemed exempt by the University of Massachusetts Medical School Institutional Review Board.

Results

Incidence

During the thirteen-year study period there were 56,527 weighted NSTI admissions in the United States with the annual incidence ranging from approximately 3,800–5,800 admissions per year. The number of cases peaked in 2004 and then decreased for an overall statistically significant decrease between 1998 and 2010 (p<0.0001).

Demographics

Table 1 depicts the basic demographics for the entire study population. Although the proportion of patients missing race data improved over time from 21.2 to 15.4% (p<0.0001), race data was far from complete. However, among those with race data recorded, the about half of patients were white (50.1–52.2%) with the percentage of Hispanics increasing (6.8 to 10.5%, p<0.0001) while the proportion of blacks decreased (19.6 to 18.6%, p<0.01) during the study period. While there were fewer women (38.6 to 34.1%, p<0.0001), an increasing percentage of NSTI patients were in the 18–34 year old (8.8 to 14.6% p<0.0001) and 50–64 year old age groups (33.2 to 43.5, p<0.0001). The proportion of patients on Medicaid also increased during the study period (17.6 to 20.1, p<0.0001).

Table 1.

Trends in patient characteristics 1998–2010 (N=56,527)

Variable

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 p-value

n=4262 n=3850 n=4307 n=4355 n=4557 n=5089 n=5815 n=4653 n=4307 n=3925 n=4033 n=3591 n=3783 <.0001

Age (%)
 18–34yo 8.8 11.0 10.8 12.1 11.3 11.5 10.3 10.3 13.1 8.8 10.3 12.7 14.6 <.0001
 35–49yo 34.2 31.9 31.0 29.9 31.3 29.0 32.1 34.7 29.0 30.6 31.8 28.7 25.6 <.0001
 50–64yo 33.2 33.1 34.8 33.6 35.6 36.0 36.5 37.0 38.7 40.3 39.8 41.7 43.5 <.0001
 >64yo 23.8 24.0 23.4 24.5 21.8 23.5 21.2 18.0 19.2 20.3 18.2 16.8 16.2 <.0001

Female (%) 38.6 41.4 39.2 41.9 39.5 39.3 37.4 41.3 35.3 34.2 40.4 37.5 34.1 <.0001

Race
 White 50.1 50.4 52.5 48.0 43.7 46.0 49.5 44.3 45.7 42.9 52.1 54.1 52.2 0.24
 Black 19.6 15.2 13.7 12.9 15.2 14.9 13.0 11.2 13.6 15.3 10.7 16.0 18.6 0.01
 Hispanic 6.8 6.8 11.7 10.2 11.3 10.2 9.2 14.9 11.3 11.9 9.8 9.2 10.5 <.0001
 Other 2.3 4.1 3.7 3.6 3.8 2.4 2.7 2.7 4.2 4.5 5.0 5.4 3.3 <.0001
 Missing 21.2 23.6 18.4 25.3 26.1 26.6 25.6 26.9 25.2 25.5 22.4 15.3 15.4 <.0001

Insurance (%)
 Medicare 33.1 33.0 32.5 33.3 31.5 33.0 32.6 26.9 31.4 29.0 26.6 26.9 26.1 <.0001
 Medicaid 17.6 18.3 13.4 16.2 17.1 17.4 16.6 17.9 17.2 16.3 17.8 22.3 20.1 <.0001
 Private 31.1 33.2 34.7 32.7 31.4 33.7 29.6 32.4 29.7 33.6 34.2 26.8 29.7 <.0001
 Self-pay 10.1 8.2 10.4 10.8 11.3 9.6 13.5 13.8 11.7 12.6 12.0 15.7 16.6 <.0001
 No charge/Other* 8.2 7.4 8.9 7.0 8.7 6.3 7.7 9.0 10.0 8.4 9.4 8.3 7.5 0.02
*

Includes Federal, Military, and Other

Co-Morbidities

Patients admitted with NSTIs were more likely to be obese (8.9 to 24.6%, p<0.0001), have uncomplicated diabetes (30.4 to 33.0%, p<0.0001), and chronic liver disease (1.0 to 4.0%, p<0.0001) during the study period. Overall, patients had more preexisting co-morbidities (Elixhauser index > 3 increased from 14.5 to 39.7%, p<0.0001). (see table 2 and figure 1)

Table 2.

Trends in specific patient co-morbidities 1998–2010 (N=56,527)

Variable

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 p-value

Individual Co-morbidities*

Obese (%) 8.9 11.6 11.2 12.4 16.4 14.5 12.7 13.7 15.7 16.5 20.4 30.0 24.6 <.0001

Diabetes Type 2 (%)
 w/Chronic Complication 17.6 17.3 13.7 14.8 14.0 13.8 13.2 14.5 14.1 15.9 14.4 14.3 14.0 <.0001
 w/o Chronic Complication 30.4 32.4 34.2 32.4 36.8 32.4 31.6 35.3 34.0 32.5 33.8 39.7 33.0 <.0001

Alcohol abuse (%) 5.9 4.8 4.4 4.5 5.1 5.9 5.1 4.8 5.9 6.1 4.3 6.5 5.7 0.02

Liver disease (%) 1.4 2.3 3.3 3.3 3.9 4.3 4.1 4.0 5.6 3.7 4.5 4.2 4.0 <.0001

Peripheral Vascular Disease (%) 6.9 6.3 5.3 5.0 6.0 6.8 5.4 4.8 4.5 5.8 5.9 7.4 5.7 0.47

Aggregate Co-morbidity Measure†

Elixhauser Index (%)
 0 12.5 13.0 10.9 11.2 11.1 10.7 12.3 10.6 10.1 7.9 8.9 5.7 8.8 <.0001
 1 27.2 22.3 25.9 24.4 20.4 19.8 19.6 19.2 17.4 17.7 15.4 12.9 14.4 <.0001
 2 28.2 28.5 28.3 27.1 25.7 26.5 26.6 23.3 23.4 23.1 23.2 20.1 20.1 <.0001
 3 17.6 20.6 21.2 20.1 21.7 23.5 21.8 23.4 22.4 23.2 22.3 20.8 17.0 0.08
 > 3 14.5 15.7 13.7 17.1 21.2 19.4 19.7 23.5 26.6 28.2 30.3 40.6 39.7 <.0001
*

These individual co-morbidities have been shown in the literature to be associated with NSTI. See Appendix 3 for a list of all co-morbidities measured by the Elixhauser Index.

†

See Elixhauser, Steiner, Harris, and Coffey, Med Care, 1998;36(1):8–27.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Trends in Elixhauser > 3, incidence of any major complication, and mortality among NSTI patients 1998–2010 (N=56,527)

Treatment

Trends in treatment of NSTI are detailed in Table 3. The percentage of patients requiring only a single surgical debridement or multiple debridements (>3) increased (43.2 to 46.2%, p<0.0001 and 13.5 to 15.9%, p<0.001 respectively) while those needing two and three surgical interventions decreased (29.5 to 26.4%, p<0.0001 and 13.4 to 11.1%, p<0.0001 respectively). Amputations were rare and ranged from 1.2%–1.9% (reported in three year intervals per the NIS data use agreement). HBOT (reported in three year intervals per the NIS data use agreement) was rarely used and its utilization decreased nationally during our study period (1.6 to 0.8%, p<0.0001). Over the study period, there was increased utilization of wound therapy (12.7 to 14.5%, p<0.0001) and less need for complex wound reconstruction (23.5 to 20.8, p<0.0001).

Table 3.

Trends in Treatment of NSTI 1998–2010 (N=56,527)

Variable

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 p-value

Surgical Intervention

Any debridement (%) 99.6 99.3 99.4 99.2 99.6 99.5 99.3 99.6 99.9 99.9 99.5 99.6 99.6 NS

Amputation (%)* 1.9 1.7 2.0 1.2 -- 0.004

Number of debridements (%)
 1 43.2 41.3 41.4 40.4 43.2 43.3 44.1 44.2 44.1 45.5 47.2 48.7 46.2 <.0001
 2 29.5 32.3 31.1 32.2 27.9 29.5 29.0 28.6 29.6 28.8 27.0 25.7 26.4 <.0001
 3 13.4 13.9 14.8 14.2 15.0 14.6 15.3 13.0 13.5 12.2 11.8 12.5 11.1 <.0001
 More than 3 13.5 11.8 12.1 12.4 13.5 12.2 10.9 13.7 12.6 13.4 13.6 12.6 15.9 0.0004

Wound Therapy

HBOT (%)* 1.6 1.6 1.3 0.8 -- <.0001

Wound care (%) 12.7 10.3 9.7 10.6 11.5 12.7 10.4 9.3 11.9 15.1 11.9 11.2 14.5 <.0001

Wound closure (%) 23.5 18.7 17.0 20.2 16.9 15.5 17.1 17.2 17.9 16.3 14.6 14.1 20.8 <.0001
*

Per the data use agreement with the Healthcare Utilization Project, we cannot display results with less than 10 patients represented in the aggregate value, thus these have been collapsed into 3 year intervals from 1998 to 2009 and not shown for 2010.

Outcomes

Table 4 lists major complications associated with NSTI. The proportion of patients having any major complication increased over the study period (30.9 to 48.2%, p<0.0001). Patients, on average, experienced a total of 0.4 to 0.7 major complications during their hospital stay. LOS remained stable at 18–19 days while overall mortality decreased (9.0 to 4.9%, p<0.0001). (see figure 1). On multivariable analyses, we found that age, sex, insurance, and Elixhauser index were predictors of any major complication; age, race, insurance, Elixhauser index, HBOT treatment, and number of major complications were predictors of LOS; and age, race, insurance, and number of major complications were predictors of mortality. After accounting for these significant confounders, each one-year incremental increase in year was associated with a 5% increased odds of complication (OR 1.05), 0.4 times decrease in hospital LOS (coefficient −0.41), and 11% decreased odds of mortality (OR 0.89) (see table 5).

Table 4.

Trends in Overall NSTI Outcomes 1998–2010 (N=56,527)

Variable

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 p-value

Complications

Any Major Complication (%) 30.9 30.5 29.1 34.0 33.8 35.8 34.7 34.5 36.9 38.5 40.6 45.5 48.2 <.0001

Specific Complications

 Cardiac (%)* 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 * 0.72

 Pulmonary (%) 16.2 13.9 14.2 17.7 16.9 17.6 18.0 18.3 18.3 20.1 19.0 22.0 22.8 <.0001

 Neurologic (%)* 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 - 0.02

 Thromboembolic (%) 3.1 2.1 3.0 2.5 3.1 4.0 3.8 2.6 4.3 4.7 4.3 4.1 7.2 <.0001
 Renal (%) 11.6 13.3 14.6 16.3 16.3 15.3 17.5 18.5 20.3 22.9 23.1 29.7 31.1 <.0001
 Infectious (%) 8.2 8.1 5.6 7.5 8.0 8.6 7.4 7.5 8.2 7.9 9.5 7.9 9.1 0.0003

Total major complications (mean sum) 0.41 0.40 0.40 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.49 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.58 0.65 0.73 <.0001

Outcomes

LOS (mean days) 19.4 19.2 18.1 19.4 18.8 17.9 17.7 17.7 18.5 18.5 18.6 18.2 18.1 0.12

LOS (median days) 13.3 13.2 11.8 13.1 13.1 12.5 12.0 12.2 12.0 12.4 11.6 12.2 11.9 0.10

Mortality (%) 9.0 10.5 10.2 11.1 10.0 7.4 8.5 5.4 6.3 5.7 4.6 5.7 4.9 <.0001
*

Per the data use agreement with the Healthcare Utilization Project, we cannot display results with less than 10 patients represented in the aggregate value, thus these have been collapsed into 3 year intervals from 1998 to 2009 and not shown for 2010.

Table 5.

Predictors of Outcomes for NSTI in Multivariable Analyses*

Outcome of interest Any Complication Hospital Length of Stay Mortality
Variable OR 95% CI Coefficient 95%CI OR 95% CI
Year 1.05 (1.04, 1.07) −0.41 (−0.49, −0.32) 0.89 (0.87, 0.91)
Age
 18–34yo ref ref ref
 35–49yo 1.30 (1.12, 1.52) 1.29 (0.39, 2.19) 1.35 (0.95, 1.92)
 50–64yo 1.69 (1.45, 1.97) 2.07 (1.15, 3.00) 2.05 (1.46, 2.88)
 >64yo 1.85 (1.54, 2.22) 1.65 (0.41, 2.89) 3.03 (2.07, 4.44)
Sex
 Male Ref ref ref
 Female 1.19 (1.09, 1.29) 0.46 (−0.16, 1.08) 1.01 (0.86, 1.18)
Race
 White Ref ref ref
 Black 1.13 (1.00, 1.27) 0.38 (−0.56, 1.33) 0.97 (0.77, 1.23)
 Hispanic 0.99 (0.86, 1.14) 0.92 (−0.09, 1.93) 1.57 (1.23, 2.00)
 Asian/Pacific Islander/Native American/Other 1.04 (0.84, 1.30) 0.92 (−0.59, 2.43) 1.77 (1.25, 2.51)
 Missing/Unknown 1.04 (0.94, 1.15) −1.29 (−1.99, −0.60) 1.14 (0.94, 1.38)
Insurance
 Private ref ref ref
 Medicare 1.42 (1.26, 1.60) 0.35 (−0.56, 1.26) 1.64 (1.30, 2.06)
 Medicaid 1.24 (1.10, 1.40) 3.76 (2.82, 4.70) 1.55 (1.21, 1.97)
 Self-pay 0.72 (0.62, 0.83) 1.58 (0.68, 2.49) 1.50 (1.12, 2.00)
 No charge/Other* 0.85 (0.72, 1.00) 1.94 (0.88, 3.00) 1.19 (0.85, 1.69)
Elixhauser Index
 0 ref ref ref
 1 1.54 (1.30, 1.83) 0.92 (−0.06, 1.90) 1.10 (0.80, 1.52)
 2 1.76 (1.49, 2.08) 2.37 (1.39, 3.35) 1.07 (0.78, 1.46)
 3 2.03 (1.71, 2.41) 2.49 (1.46, 3.51) 0.99 (0.72, 1.37)
 > 3 2.89 (2.44, 3.43) 3.70 (2.61, 4.80) 1.01 (0.73, 1.40)
HBOT treatment 0.82 (0.57, 1.18) 3.47 (1.11, 5.84) 0.57 (0.26, 1.26)
Total Major Complications -- -- 9.46 (8.9, 10.01) 2.67 (2.47, 2.88)
*

Co-variates in the model included year of treatment, age group, sex, race, insurance, Elixhauser index, and HBOT treatment. The models for mortality and LOS also included total major complications. The model for LOS included only those patients who survived hospitalization.

Discussion

NSTI, though decreasing in mortality, is a highly morbid disease. Our national, thirteen year analysis elucidates recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes for this high acuity surgical illness. We have found that there have been significant national trends in patient population, treatment patterns, and outcomes. Patients have been increasingly from Hispanic and publicly insured groups and overall co-morbidities have risen sharply along with complication rates. Despite worsening acuity, length of stay has been relatively stable and mortality has decreased by nearly 50%.

Our study found demographic changes in the NSTI population, with Hispanics accounting for a greater proportion of patients. A likely explanation for this finding is the rapid expansion of the United States Hispanic population. According to the United States Census Bureau greater than half of the total population growth within the United States during the 2000 to 2010 decade was due to increases in the Hispanic population. This segment grew 43% during this time, seeing an increase of 15.2 million persons[13]. We also found that the proportion of Medicaid patients also increased during our study period. The fact that Hispanics and Medicaid patients are being affected by this morbid infection at such increasing rates raises further questions concerning etiologies, access to care, and prevalence of risk factors that warrants further investigation. Given our findings it is important for clinicians caring for patients of diverse backgrounds to consider NSTI in their differential diagnosis for patients who present with signs and symptoms of soft tissue infection in order to ensure that all patients benefit equally from early diagnosis, aggressive debridement, and improved wound therapy.

Our results suggest, however, that even after diagnosis disparities not explained by factors such as age and co-morbidities may persist. When controlling for these possible confounders, we found that both Hispanics and Medicaid patients have an odds of mortality 1.6 times higher than white patients and privately insured patients, respectively. Meanwhile, Medicaid patients have higher odds of complications and increased lengths of stay compared to patients with private insurance. Black patients also suffer more complications than their white counterparts with NSTI. There is a growing body of evidence that patients in the United States get differential treatment based on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. The causes of these healthcare disparities are multiple and the source of much debate[14–17]. One explanation for increased lengths of stay with Medicaid patients may be that their insurance is not favorable for discharge to rehabilitation or skill nursing facilities[18]. Hospital factors may also be the source of differences in complication rates as a number of studies have shown that hospitals that treat more minority and/or indigent patients have worse outcomes[19–21]. When resources and access are otherwise equitable across groups, differences in outcomes by race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status may be due to unconscious bias[22].

The percentage of NSTI patients who were obese tripled during the study period. This follows the trend of increasing obesity among the general United States population over the past several decades. The current lifetime risk of an American becoming overweight or obese exceeds 50% and 25%, respectively[23]. Given the alarming rates of obesity in our population, the overall importance of obesity on the NSTI population maybe becoming more significant. While obesity prevention initiatives have traditionally focused on reducing risk of cardiovascular disease and certain types of cancer, the association between obesity and NSTIs is an important public health concern. Meanwhile, clinicians faced with an obese patient with seemingly subtle cellulitis with pain out of proportion to exam should have a high index of suspicion for a NSTI. Given the difficulty in diagnosis, this patient population in particular may benefit from contrast enhanced computed tomography to aid in diagnosis[24].

Early and aggressive debridement remains the mainstay of surgical management for NSTIs. During our study period there were simultaneous increases in the proportion of patients requiring only a single debridement (nearly half in 2010) and the proportion of patients requiring multiple debridements (approximately 16% in 2010). Thus, while a certain percentage of patients appear to be benefiting from early diagnosis and aggressive single debridement, the number of patients with severe, progressive disease has also increased although the proportion of patients who need amputation is very small. Notably, the decrease in non-primary skin closure along with increases in wound care procedures suggests that more recent advances in wound therapy such as negative pressure wound therapy may be benefiting NSTI patients in the modern era. More research is needed to understand the role of different wound care options on the management of NSTI patients after all necrotic tissue has been debrided. However, clinicians should consider employing such methods prior to subjecting patients to an additional donor site wounds as would be needed for complex reconstructions.

Despite the many reports regarding the utility of HBOT in the treatment of NSTI[7, 8, 25, 26], including several that report a survival advantage[8, 26], the use of HBOT in the United States is rare. This is likely because HBOT is a specialized treatment not readily available at all hospitals. Patients who did receive HBOT saw no improvements in complication rates or mortality but their hospital LOS was nearly 3.5 days higher than patients who did not undergo HBOT. Thus, we cannot recommend HBOT as an adjunct treatment for NSTI even when readily available.

Overall, the mortality rate of NSTI has declined to 4.9% nationally over the past decade. This is considerably lower than similar national studies using both NIS and NSQIP data (10.9% and 12% respectively)[4, 5]. We found that increasing age was associated with more complications and higher mortality. And, while higher co-morbidity burden increased complications and LOS, this had no effect on mortality. Importantly, however, each added complication increased LOS by almost 9.5 days and resulted in a 2.7 increased odds of mortality when controlling for confounders. This suggests that patients who may have previously died from NSTI now surviving with some measure of morbidity. Possible explanations for the stable LOS and reduced mortality despite the trend toward increased baseline co-morbidities and greater complications during treatment course include increased awareness and early diagnosis by local physicians, improvements in intensive care and resuscitative efforts, better would care options, and improved antibiotic coverage. Our findings have implications for surgeon patient discussions at the time of diagnosis of NSTI. What in the past may have been a discussion about the very high likelihood of death despite aggressive interventions is today more appropriately a detailed discussion of a reasonable chance of survival that comes after a long hospital course involving multiple trips to the operating room for removal of affected tissue and wound care and many potential complications.

This study has a number of important limitations. The NIS is an administrative dataset reliant upon UB-40 billing sheets generated by sampled hospitals. Relying on administrative data may result in underestimation of true NSTIs. However, we believe our selection strategy, combining at least one surgical debridement with a diagnosis code for NSTI, would minimize this effect. Previous research on NSTI has detailed changes in microbiology with single organism infections more prevalent in the past and polymicrobial infection more prevalent in the modern era[10]. Unfortunately, the NIS does not provide any clinical data on wound microbiology or choice of anti-microbial therapy. Without access to clinical data, administrative databases are also subject misclassification/underestimation errors for both measures of co-morbidity and complication severity. The Elixhauser Index, though validated and commonly used in studies using administrative data[27–34], simply measures presence or absence of co-morbid conditions without gauging the individual severity of each co-morbidity with the possible of exception of diabetes (see Appendix 3). Furthermore, there has been recent criticism of Elixhauser’s method but this newer application has yet to be applied widely to the literature due to a delay in implementation of ICD-10 codes in US administrative data[27]. Similarly, we are also unable to measure complication severity using common, validated metrics such as the Accordion Severity Grading System of Surgical Complications, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score or the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score that rely upon actual clinical data points that are not available in the NIS. Additionally, factors not captured by the administrative database may lead to an underestimation complications rates due both to limitations on the total number of fields available for coding complications and lack of readmission data (NIS treats each admission as a stand-alone event). Our finding of increased co-morbidity burden over the study period may have been due to up-coding by billing specialists or improved documentation by providers rather than a true increase in pre-existing conditions among NSTI patients. However, based on other studies on the overall health of the US population we believe that our findings represent a true change in patient characteristics[35, 36]. It is also possible that increases in complications were attributable similar “improvements” in coding. It is well known that race is coded poorly in administrative data, thus our demographic findings may also be at risk for misclassifications; however, we know of no other large national dataset which would provide more precise race data for NSTI patients. Finally, the overall use of HBOT and amputations was very low and our ability to judge trends in these treatments was thus limited.

Appendix 3.

Temporal trends in all co-morbidities measured by the Elixhauser Index†

Co-morbidity 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 p-value
CHF 1.9 2.2 2.3 3.2 3.1 2.6 2.0 3.0 2.2 3.2 7.2 6.5 8.3 <.0001
Valvular disease *
Pulmonary circulation disorders *
Peripheral vascular disorders 6.9 6.3 5.3 5.0 6.0 6.8 5.4 4.8 4.5 5.8 5.9 7.4 5.7 0.47
Hypertension 23.1 27.4 26.9 30.4 35.3 36.7 33.4 37.6 40.7 41.6 43.4 50.7 47.3 <.0001
Paralysis 3.0 3.3 2.2 3.1 2.2 2.5 2.1 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.9 3.5 3.2 0.87
Other neurological disorders 5.3 4.4 3.4 4.2 4.4 4.6 3.5 3.6 4.9 2.8 3.4 4.0 5.3 0.12
Chronic pulmonary disease 11.2 11.7 10.9 11.2 12.2 12.1 13.4 13.9 14.2 13.1 11.7 13.5 12.9 <.0001
Diabetes, uncomplicated 30.4 32.4 34.2 32.4 36.8 32.4 31.6 35.3 34.0 32.5 33.8 39.7 33.0 <.0001
Diabetes, complicated 17.6 17.3 13.7 14.8 14.0 13.8 13.2 14.5 14.1 15.9 14.4 14.3 14.0 <.0001
Hypothyroidism 2.2 2.6 3.2 4.3 4.2 3.3 4.0 3.5 2.7 4.3 4.3 5.2 5.7 <.0001
Renal failure 6.0 6.6 5.1 6.4 6.1 6.0 7.2 7.8 12.0 12.7 8.8 13.4 13.4 <.0001
Liver disease 1.4 2.3 3.3 3.3 3.9 4.3 4.1 4.0 5.6 3.7 4.5 4.2 4.0 <.0001
Peptic ulcer disease *
AIDS *
Lymphoma *
Metastatic cancer *
Solid tumor without metastasis *
Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseases *
Coagulopathy 6.0 6.6 5.9 7.2 6.1 5.7 6.3 4.5 5.0 4.9 4.5 7.8 7.8 0.90
Obesity 8.9 11.6 11.2 12.4 16.4 14.5 12.7 13.7 15.7 16.5 20.4 30.0 24.6 <.0001
Weight loss 8.8 7.4 7.2 8.0 9.4 8.4 9.1 9.7 10.0 12.7 12.7 15.5 18.4 <.0001
Fluid and electrolyte disorders 25.5 28.4 28.0 28.1 30.0 30.9 30.7 34.1 36.2 35.9 37.2 39.3 38.0 <.0001
Blood loss anemia *
Deficiency anemia 12.6 14.3 15.1 15.9 14.3 16.3 15.2 16.6 17.9 18.4 21.5 24.5 22.4 <.0001
Alcohol abuse 5.9 4.8 4.4 4.5 5.1 5.9 5.1 4.8 5.9 6.1 4.3 6.5 5.7 0.02
Drug abuse 12.9 7.3 9.6 6.1 6.6 7.8 10.3 8.2 9.1 11.2 8.3 9.1 10.2 0.24
Psychoses 2.0 2.3 2.1 4.0 2.7 2.5 3.6 4.1 3.5 3.7 6.6 4.7 5.6 <.0001
Depression 2.1 3.2 3.6 4.0 3.6 4.6 6.0 5.8 5.7 5.8 7.3 8.8 10.2 <.0001
†

ICD-9 codes for these co-morbidities from Elixhauser, Steiner, Harris, and Coffey, Med Care, 1998;36(1):8–27

*

Per the data use agreement with the Healthcare Utilization Project, we cannot display results with less than 10 patients represented in the aggregate value, thus these have not shown for co-morbidities with fewer than 10 unweighted patients per year in our cohort.

Despite these limitations, this nationwide analysis of NSTI is, to our knowledge, the largest population-based sample of NSTI in the US population and has shown that demographics and co-morbidity shifts have occurred and complications have increased. Meanwhile, however, LOS has been relatively stable and mortality has decreased. This suggests improvements of our modern health care system during this study period may be at play. Further research is needed to determine which aspects of anti-microbial treatment, critical care, surgical debridement, and wound management provide these improvements in the overall outcomes of NSTI patients. Future studies looking at NSTI risk factors including socioeconomic status, access to health care, and underlying disease are also necessary to better understand this disease and increasing our ability to prevent, diagnose, and treat it.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Gordon Fitzgerald, PhD from the Center for Outcomes Research at the University of Massachusetts Medical School for his assistance in statistical review for this manuscript.

Footnotes

Presentations: This research was presented as a Quick Shot podium presentation at the Academic Surgical Congress 7th Annual Meeting Feb. 2012, Las Vegas, NV.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Ward RG, Walsh MS. Necrotizing fasciitis: 10 years’ experience in a district general hospital. Br J Surg. 1991;78(4):488–9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wong CH, Chang HC, Pasupathy S, et al. Necrotizing fasciitis: clinical presentation, microbiology, and determinants of mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(8):1454–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kaul R, McGreer A, Low DE, et al. Population-based surveillance for group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis: Clinical features, prognostic indicators, and microbiologic analysis of seventy-seven cases. Ontario Group A Streptococcal Study. Am J Med. 1997;103(1):18–24. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00160-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mills MK, Faraklas I, Davis C, et al. Outcomes from treatment of necrotizing soft-tissue infections: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Am J Surg. 2010;200(6):790–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Endorf FW, Klein MB, Mack CD, et al. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections: differences in patients treated at burn centers and non-burn centers. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29(6):933–8. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31818ba112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mulla ZD, Gibbs SG, Aronoff DM. Correlates of length of stay, cost of care, and mortality among patients hospitalized for necrotizing fasciitis. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135(5):868–76. doi: 10.1017/S0950268806007448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jallali N, Withey S, Butler PE. Hyperbaric oxygen as adjuvant therapy in the management of necrotizing fasciitis. Am J Surg. 2005;189(4):462–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wilkinson D, Doolette D. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment and survival from necrotizing soft tissue infection. Arch Surg. 2004;139(12):1339–45. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.12.1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Czymek R, Hildebrand P, Kleemann M, et al. New insights into the epidemiology and etiology of Fournier’s gangrene: a review of 33 patients. Infection. 2009;37(4):306–12. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-8169-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sarani B, Strong M, Pascual J, Schwab CW. Necrotizing fasciitis: current concepts and review of the literature. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(2):279–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. Necrotizing soft-tissue infection: diagnosis and management. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(5):705–10. doi: 10.1086/511638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Awsakulsutthi S. A retrospective review of necrotizing fasciitis in Thammasat University Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010;93(Suppl 7):S246–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Humes K. Overview of Race and Hispnic Origin: 2010 (2010 Census Briefs) United States Census Bureau; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Smedley BD. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bach PB, Schrag D, Brawley OW, et al. Survival of blacks and whites after a cancer diagnosis. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2106–13. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Slatore CG, Au DH, Gould MK. An official American Thoracic Society systematic review: insurance status and disparities in lung cancer practices and outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(9):1195–205. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2009-038ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vogel TR. Update and review of racial disparities in sepsis. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2012;13(4):203–8. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lane-Fall MB, Iwashyan TJ, Cooke CR, et al. Insurance and racial differences in long-term acute care utilization after critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(4):1143–9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318237706b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ly DP, Lopez L, Isaac T, Jha AK. How do black-serving hospitals perform on patient safety indicators? Implications for national public reporting and pay-for-performance. Med Care. 2010;48(12):1133–7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f81c7e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hasnain-Wynia R, Baker DW, Nerenz D, et al. Disparities in health care are driven by where minority patients seek care: examination of the hospital quality alliance measures. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(12):1233–9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.12.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bach PB. Racial disparities and site of care. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(2 Suppl 2):S31–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Santry HP, Wren SM. The role of unconscious bias in surgical safety and outcomes. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92(1):137–51. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Cobain M, et al. Estimated risks for developing obesity in the Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(7):473–80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-7-200510040-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zacharias N, Velmahos GC, Salama A, et al. Diagnosis of necrotizing soft tissue infections by computed tomography. Arch Surg. 2010;145(5):452–5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Massey PR, Sakran JV, Mills AM, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in necrotizing soft tissue infections. J Surg Res. 2012;177(1):146–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Escobar SJ, Slade JB, Jr, Hunt TK, Cianci P. Adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2)for treatment of necrotizing fasciitis reduces mortality and amputation rate. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2005;32(6):437–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A, et al. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care. 2009;47(6):626–33. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819432e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Drolet S, Maclean AR, Stewart DA, et al. Primary colorectal lymphoma-clinical outcomes in a population-based series. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(10):1851–7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1572-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kaplan GG, Hubbard J, Panaccione R, et al. Risk of comorbidities on postoperative outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Arch Surg. 2011;146(8):959–64. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Csikesz NG, Nguyen LN, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Nationwide volume and mortality after elective surgery in cirrhotic patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(1):96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Myers RP, Quan H, Hubbard JN, et al. Predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis: results differ across risk adjustment methods. Hepatology. 2009;49(2):568–77. doi: 10.1002/hep.22676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Singla A, Csikesz NG, Simons JP, et al. National hospital volume in acute pancreatitis: analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 1998–2006. HPB (Oxford) 2009;11(5):391–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00072.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Singla A, Li Y, Ng SC, et al. Is the growth in laparoscopic surgery reproducible with more complex procedures? Surgery. 2009;146(2):367–74. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294(15):1909–17. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.15.1909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nguyen NT, Mango CP, Lane KT, et al. Association of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome with obesity: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2004. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(6):928–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Health, United States. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics; 2010. [Accessed 10/10/12]. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus10.pdf. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES