Table 3.
ASA score | Dead | Total | Risk | RD (cem−uncem) | NNHa | 95 % CI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||||
1 + 2 | Uncemented | 2 | 1,002 | 0.002 | ||||
Cemented | 11 | 3,407 | 0.003 | 0.0012 | 811 | 218 | ∞ | |
3 | Uncemented | 7 | 1,390 | 0.005 | ||||
Cemented | 79 | 4,755 | 0.017 | 0.0116 | 86 | 59 | 157 | |
4 + 5 | Uncemented | 3 | 144 | 0.021 | ||||
Cemented | 26 | 512 | 0.051 | 0.0299 | 33 | 17 | ∞ | |
1–5 | Uncemented | 12 | 2,536 | 0.005 | ||||
Cemented | 116 | 8,674 | 0.013 | 0.0086 | 116 | 82 | 199 |
CI confidence interval
aNumber of patients treated with a cemented implant in order to cause one fatality because of cementation compared to an uncemented implant if there is a direct causal effect. The NNH was calculated as an inverse value of the risk difference (RD) between the methods [1/(risk cemented − risk uncemented)]