Table 3. Multivariate Logistic Regression Analyses Examining Factors Associated With Bidi and Hookah Use Among Youth in Grades 9–12, Youth Smoking Survey, Canada, 2010a .
Characteristic or Behavior | Model 1b
|
Model 2c
|
Model 3d
|
Model 4e
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ever Use of Bidis |
Current Use of Bidis |
Ever Use of Hookahs |
Current Use of Hookahs |
|||||
ORf (95% CI) | P Valueg | ORf (95% CI) | P Valueg | ORf (95% CI) | P Valueg | ORf (95% CI) | P Valueg | |
Sex | ||||||||
Female | 1 [Reference] | |||||||
Male | 2.5 (2.0–3.1) | <.001 | 1.5 (1.1–2.1) | .01 | 1.1 (1.0–1.2) | .16 | 1.3 (1.1–1.4) | <.01 |
Race/ethnicity | ||||||||
White | 1 [Reference] | |||||||
Black, Latin, other | 4.6 (3.7–5.8) | <.001 | 15.6 (10.8–22.5) | <.001 | 2.2 (1.9–2.5) | <.001 | 2.4 (2.1–2.9) | <.001 |
Asian | 3.2 (2.2–4.7) | <.001 | 14.9 (8.9–24.9) | <.001 | 1.5 (1.3–1.8) | <.001 | 1.5 (1.2–2.0) | <.01 |
Aboriginal | 1.1 (0.8–1.7) | .56 | 3.3 (1.9–5.7) | <.001 | 0.6 (0.5–0.7) | <.001 | 0.8 (0.6–1.1) | .20 |
Cigarette smoking statush | ||||||||
Nonsmoker | 1 [Reference] | |||||||
Former | 1.9 (1.2–3.1) | .01 | 0.2 (0–0.7) | .02 | 5.5 (4.4–6.9) | <.001 | 3.3 (2.5–4.4) | <.001 |
Current | 4.1 (3.3–5.2) | <.001 | 6.7 (4.8–9.5) | <.001 | 2.4 (2.1–2.6) | <.001 | 3.0 (2.5–3.5) | <.001 |
Marijuana use statush | ||||||||
Nonuser | 1 [Reference] | |||||||
Occasional user | 4.9 (3.3–7.2) | <.001 | 23.9 (10.8–53.0) | <.001 | 4.8 (4.2–5.4) | <.001 | 5.6 (4.4–7.1) | <.001 |
Frequent user | 13.1 (9.0–19.1) | <.001 | 50.4 (22.9–111.0) | <.001 | 11.6 (10.1–13.3) | <.001 | 14.1 (11.1–18.0) | <.001 |
Current alcohol use statush | ||||||||
Nondrinker | 1 [Reference] | |||||||
Occasional drinker | 1.3 (0.9–2.0) | .16 | 0.4 (0.2–0.7) | <.01 | 2.5 (2.1–3.0) | <.001 | 2.8 (2.1–3.8) | <.001 |
Frequent drinker | 2.2 (1.5–3.4) | <.001 | 1.3 (0.8–2.3) | .29 | 3.3 (2.8–4.0) | <.001 | 3.6 (2.7–5.0) | <.001 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Analyses were conducted using weighted data.
Model 1: 1 = yes (n = 550), 0 = no (n = 27,123).
Model 2: 1 = yes (n = 264), 0 = no (n = 26,937).
Model 3: 1 = yes (n = 2,166), 0 = no (n = 25,507).
Model 4: 1 = yes (n = 881), 0 = no (n = 26,320).
Odds ratios adjusted for all other variables in the table and controlling for grade and province.
Calculated by using Wald χ2 tests.
See Methods section for definitions of characteristics.