Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Atten Disord. 2012 Apr 27;18(3):212–225. doi: 10.1177/1087054712443160

Table 4.

Hierarchical Regressions testing the relation between ADHD Dimensional Scales and Perceived Need for ADHD Treatment

Adolescent PNT (N = 158) Caregiver PNT (N = 156)
B SE(B) β P B SE(B) β P

Stepl:
   Gender .21 .20 .08 Ns −.21 .26 −.07 Ns
  Number of CODs1 .19 .08 .21 >05 .09 .10 .07 Ns
Step 2:
  ADHD-I/D .18 .05 .33 >.001 .31 .05 .48 >.001
  ADHD-H/I −.06 .05 −.11 Ns .06 .04 .10 Ns
Step 3:
  ADHD-I/D*Gender .04 .09 .13 Ns −.07 .10 −.20 Ns
  ADHD-H/I*Gender −.03 .09 −.11 Ns .13 .09 .37 Ns
  ADHD-I/D*ADHD-H/I −.02 .02 −.21 Ns −.04 .02 −.61 >.05

Note.

PNT = Perceived Need for Treatment; COD = Co-Occurring Diagnosis; I/D = Inattentive/Disorganized Scale; H/I = Hyperactive/Impulsive Scale

1

In order to account for potential influence of co-occurring diagnoses (i.e., diagnoses other than ADHD) on PNT, the total number of co-occurring diagnoses for each adolescent was included as a covariate.

For Adolescent PNT, R2 change was .06 for Step 1 (p > .01), .09 for Step 2 (p < .001), and .01 for Step 3 (ns).

For Caregiver PNT, R2 change was .01 for Step 1 (ns), .28 for Step 2 (p < .001), and .04 for Step 3 (p = .06).