Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jan 9;94(6):1207–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.004

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Comparison of normalized sacral skin perfusion in response to wheelchair tilt-in-space (T: 15°, 25°, 35°) in combination with recline (R: 100°, 120°). Normalized sacral skin perfusion did not show any significant difference between six conditions (N.S.). However, normalized skin perfusion over the ischial tuberosity showed a significant increase at 4 conditions (15°, 25°, and 35° tilt-in-space combined with 120° recline and 35° tilt-in-space combined with 100° recline) (P<.0083). Data shown as mean ± SE.