Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 17;33(16):6716–6725. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4237-12.2013

Table 1.

Circadian rhythmicity

Genotype Entrain condition Entrain temp (°C) Free run (°C) n Rhy (%) Period (h) FFT
Wild-type LD 25 25 77 95 23.93 ± 0.03 0.15 ± 0.01
trpA1GAL4 LD 25 25 59 90 23.90 ± 0.04 0.17 ± 0.01
trpA1GAL4/+ LD 25 25 16 100 23.83 ± 0.02 0.21 ± 0.02
trpA11 LD 25 25 32 94 23.63 ± 0.05 0.15 ± 0.01
Wild-type LD 29 29 16 100 23.69 ± 0.06 0.15 ± 0.01
trpA1GAL4 LD 29 29 16 100 23.66 ± 0.05 0.14 ± 0.01
trpA1GAL4/+ LD 29 29 15 100 23.68 ± 0.03 0.14 ± 0.01
Wild-type TC 25/16 25 45 93 23.66 ± 0.08 0.15 ± 0.01
trpA11 TC 25/16 25 45 96 23.28 ± 0.04* 0.13 ± 0.01
trpA1GAL4 TC 25/16 25 36 83 23.11 ± 0.08* 0.10 ± 0.01
trpA1GAL4/trpA11 TC 25/16 25 31 100 23.36 ± 0.07* 0.15 ± 0.01
UAS-trpA1-A;trpA1GAL4 TC 25/16 25 28 96 23.64 ± 0.04 0.22 ± 0.01
UAS-trpA1-A;trpA11 TC 25/16 25 29 97 23.19 ± 0.07* 0.08 ± 0.01
tim-GAL4/+;trpA11 TC 25/16 25 16 81 23.32 ± 0.12* 0.10 ± 0.01
tim-GAL4/UAS-trpA1-A; trpA11 TC 25/16 25 16 88 24.12 ± 0.09 0.15 ± 0.02
trpA1GAL4/+ TC 25/16 25 16 100 23.71 ± 0.06 0.20 ± 0.02

The flies were exposed to either LD or TC using a 12/12 h paradigm. Data are shown as the period and FFT values (±SEM) after the LD or TC cycles during days 2–7 of the free runs.

*p < 0.05, significant differences from wild-type using ANOVA and the Scheffé post hoc tests. Rhy, Rhythmicity.