Table 6.
Percentage improvement in headache frequency | n | Mean change in MSQ | SD | SRM | F valuea | p Valuea | F valueb | p Valueb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Role restrictive | ||||||||
Study 1 (%) | ||||||||
≥50 | 234 | 23.3 | 24.0 | 1.0 | 63.5 | <0.001 | 63.4 | <0.001 |
≥30 to <50 | 107 | 12.6 | 20.1 | 0.6 | ||||
<30 | 244 | 3.0 | 14.0 | 0.2 | ||||
Study 2 (%) | ||||||||
≥50 | 269 | 23.1 | 22.4 | 1.0 | 72.9 | <0.001 | 71.2 | <0.001 |
≥30 to <50 | 116 | 10.6 | 21.8 | 0.5 | ||||
<30 | 262 | 2.7 | 15.0 | 0.2 | ||||
Role preventive | ||||||||
Study 1 (%) | ||||||||
≥50 | 234 | 18.5 | 22.2 | 0.8 | 45.4 | <0.001 | 45.3 | <0.001 |
≥30 to <50 | 107 | 11.2 | 19.0 | 0.6 | ||||
<30 | 243 | 1.7 | 16.4 | 0.1 | ||||
Study 2 (%) | ||||||||
≥50 | 269 | 18.4 | 22.8 | 0.8 | 54.9 | <0.001 | 55.4 | <0.001 |
≥30 to <50 | 116 | 8.5 | 20.1 | 0.4 | ||||
<30 | 262 | 0.4 | 16.1 | 0.0 | ||||
Emotional function | ||||||||
Study 1 (%) | ||||||||
≥50 | 233 | 24.6 | 27.91 | 0.88 | 50.7 | <0.001 | 50.6 | <0.001 |
≥30 to <50 | 105 | 14.9 | 23.56 | 0.63 | ||||
<30 | 243 | 2.2 | 20.58 | 0.11 | ||||
Study 2 (%) | ||||||||
≥50 | 269 | 26.8 | 26.34 | 1.02 | 74.6 | <0.001 | 73.9 | <0.001 |
≥30 to <50 | 116 | 11.0 | 24.84 | 0.44 | ||||
<30 | 261 | 1.8 | 19.97 | 0.09 |
Percentage improvement in 28-day frequency of headache days was evaluated as
MSQ Migraine-Specific Questionnaire, SD standard deviation, SRM standardized response mean
a F statistics and p values for between-category comparisons are from analysis of variance (ANOVA). The main effect in the ANOVA was ranked category of decrease in number of headache days, where the type III sum of squares was used
b F statistics and p values for between-category comparisons are from analysis of variance (ANOVA). The main effects in the ANOVA included ranked category of decrease in number of headache days and medication-overuse strata, where the type III sum of squares was used