Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: Anim Genet. 2012 Mar 23;43(6):730–738. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02351.x

Table 2.

The p-values of the most significant ECA16 fine-mapping SNPs after additive logistic regression and Bonferroni correction.

Sex as a Covariate2 Sex and Raced as Covariates3

SNP Position1 Pop 1 Pop 2 All All, Mixed
Model
Pop 1 All All, Mixed
Model
chr16.28806500 1.0 (0) 0.042 (1.38) * 0.005 (2.28) * 0.005 (2.28) * 1.0 (0) 0.007 (2.13) * 0.007 (2.16) *
chr16.28961378 0.044 (1.35) * 1.0 (0) 0.012 (1.92) * 0.019 (1.72) * 0.071 (1.15) 0.011 (1.95) * 0.016 (1.79) *
chr16.29349242 0.009 (2.07) * 1.0 (0) 0.024 (1.63) * 0.022 (1.65) * 0.024 (1.61) * 0.012 (1.93) * 0.011 (1.97) *
chr16.29879300 0.065 (1.19) 1.0 (0) 0.022 (1.65) * 0.048 (1.32) * 0.063 (1.20) 0.029 (1.53) * 0.050 (1.30) *
chr16.29937753 0.072 (1.14) 1.0 (0) 0.019 (1.73) * 0.039 (1.41) * 0.074 (1.13) 0.023 (1.64) * 0.039 (1.41) *
chr16.30549587 1.0 (0) 0.037 (1.43) * 0.043 (1.37) * 0.031 (1.51) * 1.0 (0) 0.030 (1.52) * 0.023 (1.64) *
chr16.31717513 1.0 (0) 0.201 (0.70) 0.009 (2.04) * 0.008 (2.12) * 1.0 (0) 0.008 (2.09) * 0.007 (2.13) *
chr16.31837350 0.127 (0.90) 1.0 (0) 0.019 (1.73) * 0.019 (1.72) * 0.156 (0.81) 0.020 (1.69) * 0.020 (1.71) *
chr16.31837487 0.127 (0.90) 1.0 (0) 0.019 (1.73) * 0.019 (1.72) * 0.156 (0.81) 0.020 (1.69) * 0.020 (1.71) *
chr16.31943558 0.537 (0.27) 0.914 (0.04) 0.003 (2.57) * 0.004 (2.39) * 1.0 (0) 0.002 (2.62) * 0.004 (2.45) *
chr16.32011126 0.537 (0.27) 0.914 (0.04) 0.003 (2.57) * 0.004 (2.39) * 1.0 (0) 0.002 (2.62) * 0.004 (2.45) *
chr16.32340326 0.188 (0.73) 0.962 (0.02) 0.001 (3.00) * 0.001 (3.00) * 1.0 (0) 0.0003 (3.46) * 0.0003 (3.51) *
chr16.32365482 0.246 (0.61) 1.0 (0) 0.043 (1.36) * 0.032 (1.50) * 1.0 (0) 0.024 (1.62) * 0.019 (1.73) *
chr16.32428436 0.534 (0.27) 0.647 (0.19) 0.001 (3.27) * 0.001 (3.02) * 1.0 (0) 0.0002 (3.65) * 0.0004 (3.44) *
chr16.33060460 0.587 (0.23) 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0) 0.026 (1.59) * 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0)
chr16.33077036 0.587 (0.23) 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0) 0.026 (1.59) * 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0)
chr16.33085358 0.587 (0.23) 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0) 0.026 (1.59) * 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0)
chr16.33094013 0.583 (0.23) 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0) 0.025 (1.61) * 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0)
chr16.33132124 0.587 (0.23) 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0) 0.026 (1.59) * 1.0 (0) 1.0 (0)
chr16.36163336 1.0 (0) 0.063 (1.20) 0.023 (1.64) * 0.036 (1.44) * 1.0 (0) 0.034 (1.47) * 0.046 (1.34) *
chr16.41773281 0.010 (1.99) * 1.0 (0) 0.035 (1.46) * 0.033 (1.48) * 0.003 (2.47) * 0.039 (1.41) * 0.034 (1.46) *
chr16.41818090 0.010 (1.99) * 1.0 (0) 0.157 (0.81) 0.163 (0.79) 0.003 (2.47) * 0.175 (0.76) 0.171 (0.77)
chr16.41997223 0.005 (2.29) * 1.0 (0) 0.055 (1.26) 0.054 (1.27) 0.001 (2.99) * 0.064 (1.19) 0.059 (1.23)
1

Position of the SNP on chromosome 16.

2

The p-values after additive logistic regression with sex as a covariate and Bonferroni correction for horses in population 1, population 2, both populations together, and both populations together with a mixed model using the relationship matrix derived from pedigrees (negative log p-values are adjacently listed in parentheses).

3

The p-values after additive logistic regression with sex and racing history as covariates and Bonferroni correction for horses in population 1, both populations together, and both populations together with a mixed model using the relationship matrix derived from pedigrees (negative log p-values are adjacently listed in parentheses).

*

p-value < 0.05