Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2008 Nov 20;73(2):328–332. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.501

Table 1.

Overall Characteristics of Post Chemotherapy RPLND Patients

Non-Nerve-
Sparing
Nerve-Sparing
Study Cohort
p-Value
# % # %
n 205 135

Age, yrs Median (IQR) 34 (27, 41) 30 (24,35) <0.001

Laterality Left 87 (42%) 81 (60%) 0.001
Right 112 (55%) 54 (40%)
Bilateral 1 (0%) 0 (0%)
Extragonadal Disease 5 (3%) 0 (0%)

Clinical Stage l 14 (7%) 10 (7%) <0.001
lS 3 (1%) 3 (2%)
lla 14 (7%) 31 (23%)
llb 48 (23%) 40 (30%)
llc 47 (23%) 20 (15%)
lll 79 (39%) 31 (23%)

IGCCCG Risk Good 131 (64%) 113 (84%) 0.001
Intermediate 35 (17%) 15 (11%)
Poor 38 (19%) 7 (5%)
Missing 1 (0%) 0 (0%)

Chemo Intent Induction 193 (94%) 126 (93%) 0.96
Relapse 11 (5%) 7 (5%)
Missing 1 (1%) 2 (2%)

Chemo Regimen BEP 93 (45%) 28 (21%) <0.001
EP 108 (53%) 107 (79%)
Other 4 (2%) 0 (0%)

2nd Line Chemo 37 (18%) 7 (5%) 0.001

Elevated Marker 42 (20%) 7 (5%) <0.001

PC-RP Nodal Size <2cm 88 (43%) 104 (77%)
2–5cm 54 (26%) 22 (16%)
>5cm 54 (26%) 9 (7%)
missing 9 (4%) 0 (0%)

Template Bilateral With 138 (67%) 36 (27%) 0.001
Contralateral Iliacs
Bilateral Without 54 (26%) 99 (73%)
Contralateral Iliacs
Other 12 (6%) 0 (0%)
Missing 1 (1%)

Number of Nodes Median (IQR) 25 (20, 40) 27 (19,39) 0.083

Pathology Fibrosis/Necrosis 100 (49%) 82 (61%) <0.001
Teratoma 80 (39%) 53 (39%)
Viable Germ Cell 25 (12%) 0 (0%)

IQR: interquartile range, IGCCCG: International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group, RP: retroperitoneal, PC-RPLND: post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection