Skip to main content
. 2013 May 28;14(Suppl 3):S7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-S3-S7

Table 3.

Prediction accuracies, sensitivities, specificities, AUC values and Matthew's correlation coefficients (MCC) compared between methods (based on COBR dataset)

Tool Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity AUC MCC
CHASM 50% 0% 100% 0.36 0.08

MutationAssessor 70% 91% 50% 0.74 0.46

Condel 66% 66% 66% 0.68 0.33

PolyPhen-2 65% 63% 66% 0.63 0.30

SIFT 64% 73% 55% 0.63 0.29

SNAP 62% 45% 78% 0.59 0.26

mCluster 50% 0% 100% 0.46 0

logRE 54% 44% 64% 0.53 0.08