Table 3.
Comparison of the level of noise in the recovered HRF for different regressors. Combined (simulations + experimental finger tapping) results are shown.
| Method | Noise (μM) | Comparison with GLM (%) | Comparison with Det SS (%) | Comparison with Src SS (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise HbO | ||||
| GLM | 6.6 | |||
| Det SS | 4.6 | -30.5 | ||
| Src SS | 4.3 | -34.7 | ||
| Src&Det | 2.7 | -59.3 | -41.5 | -37.7 |
| Noise HbR | ||||
| GLM | 3 3 | |||
| Det SS | 3.2 | -2.6 | ||
| Src SS | 3.2 | -2.6 | ||
| Src&Det | 1.8 | -47.1 | -45.7 | -44.9 |
| Variability HbO | ||||
| GLM | 19.1 | |||
| Det SS | 10.3 | -46.0 | ||
| Src SS | 11.9 | -37.6 | ||
| Src&Det | 5.4 | -71.9 | -47.9 | -54.9 |
| Variability HbR | ||||
| GLM | 12.8 | |||
| Det SS | 9.4 | -26.9 | ||
| Src SS | 9.7 | -24.7 | ||
| Src&Det | 3.0 | -76.4 | -67.6 | -68.6 |