Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2013 Feb 20;84:69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.011

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of individual- and team-level variables in Wave 1 and changes between Wave 1 and Wave 2.

Variable Individual level (N = 531)
Team level (N = 130)
Mean/Percent S.D. Mean of Team
Mean/Percent
Mean of Team S.D. Mean of
Team IRR
Dependent variables
Smoking status
  Non-smoker at Wave 1, smoker at Wave 2 2% 0.15 22% 0.05
  Smoker at Wave 1 and non-smoker at Wave 2 22% 0.15 32% 0.04
  Non-smoker at Wave 1 and Wave 2 83% 0.38 82% 0.29
  Smoker at Wave 1 and Wave 2 13% 0.33 13% 0.23
Smoking Frequency (#days/week): Wave 1 0.6 1.79 0.64 1.17
Smoking Frequency (#days/week): Wave 2 – Wave 1 −0.03 1.03 −0.05 0.59
Alcohol use
  Non-drinker at Wave 1, drinker at Wave 2 32% 0.18 32% 0.06
  Drinker at Wave 1 and non-drinker at Wave 2 32% 0.18 32% 0.06
  Non-drinker at Wave 1 and Wave 2 92% 0.28 82% 0.17
  Drinker at Wave 1 and Wave 2 85% 0.36 86% 0.24
Drinking Frequency (#days/week): Wave 1 1.83 1.8 1.83 1.73
Drinking Frequency (#days/week): Wave 2 – Wave 1 0.02 1.29 0.01 0.94
Exercise status
  Not exercise at Wave 1, exercise at Wave 2 52% 0.21 42% 0.1
  Exercise at Wave 1 and not exercise at Wave 2 72% 0.25 72% 0.14
  Not exercise at Wave 1 and Wave 2 42% 0.19 42% 0.08
  Exercise at Wave 1 and Wave 2 85% 0.36 85% 0.28
Exercise Frequency (#days/week): Wave 1 2.59 2.08 2.63 2.01
Exercise Frequency (#days/week): Wave 2 – Wave 1 −0.31 1.71 −0.41 1.45
Perceived Enough Time for Sleep (0–10): Wave 1 5.37 2.58 5.24 2.41
Perceived Enough Time for Sleep (0–10): Wave 2 – Wave 1 0.16 2.15 0.2 2.02
Perceived Enough Time for Healthy Meals (0–10): Wave 1 5.17 2.49 5.14 2.32
Perceived Enough Time for Healthy Meals (0–10): Wave 2 – Wave 1 0.16 2.22 0.16 1.97
Independent variables
ROWE 52% 0.5 55% 0
Spillover between work and home
  Negative Work-Home: Wave 1 2.91 0.66 2.92 0.6 0.71
  Negative Work-Home Change: Wave 2 – Wave 1 −0.04 0.54 −0.06 0.49 0.95
  Positive Work-Home: Wave 1 2.99 0.63 3 0.56 0.68
  Positive Work-Home Change: Wave 2 – Wave 1 −0.05 0.6 −0.04 0.51 0.93
  Negative Home-Work: Wave 1 2.26 0.6 2.27 0.55 0.74
  Negative Home-Work Change: Wave 2 – Wave 1 0.01 0.58 0.01 0.53 0.94
  Positive Home-Work: Wave 1 3.3 0.58 3.31 0.54 0.75
  Positive Home-Work Change: Wave 2 – Wave 1 −0.06 0.55 −0.07 0.49 0.95
Baseline spillover clusters (Wave 1)
  High Negative Spillover (N = 206) 39% 0.49 39% 0.42
  High Positive Spillover (N = 201) 38% 0.49 39% 0.41
  Low Overall Spillover (N = 124) 23% 0.42 22% 0.33
Home ecologies (Wave 1)
  Singles, High Home Control (N = 152) 29% 0.45 26% 0.38
  Adult Care Providers, Low Home Control (N = 66) 12% 0.33 13% 0.23
  Married, Ave. Home Control (N = 201) 38% 0.49 37% 0.43
  Parents, Preschooler, Low Home Control (N = 76) 14% 0.35 15% 0.25
  Parents, Child Chronic Health, Low Home Control (N = 36) 72% 0.25 82% 0.14
Demographics (Wave 1)
Woman 47% 0.5 47% 0.44
Age
  20–29 46% 0.5 40% 0.34
  30–39 39% 0.49 44% 0.43
  40–59 15% 0.36 17% 0.24
Holds a manager position 33% 0.47 37% 0.27
No. of Life Events between Wave 1 and Wave 2 0.85 1.09 0.83 0.87

Notes : 1. In our analytic sample, the team sizes range from 2 to 14, with an average of 5.5 and standard deviation of 3.1; 2. Mean of team standard deviations are calculated for teams with at least 3 respondents (there are 87 such teams); 3. IRR: interrater reliability, see text for explanation.