Skip to main content
. 2013 May 13;2013:878521. doi: 10.1155/2013/878521

Table 1.

EA period-dependent protection against ischemic injury.

Groups Neurological deficit Infarct volume Death rate
Ischemia 6.0 ± 0.5 (5 ~ 7) (n = 37) 32.8% ± 3.7% (n = 16) 18% (8 out of 45)
EA-5 min 5.0 ± 0.5 (4 ~ 6) (n = 16)∗▲ 25.6% ± 5.3% (n = 12)∗▲ 11% (2 out of 18)∗∗▲
EA-15 min 3.0 ± 0.5 (2 ~ 4) (n = 15)∗∗▲ 15.4% ± 4.2% (n = 12)∗∗▲ 6% (1 out of 16)∗∗▲
EA-30 min 1.0 ± 0.5 (0 ~ 2) (n = 28)∗∗▲ 4.9% ± 1.2% (n = 12)∗∗▲ 7% (2 out of 30)∗∗▲
EA-45 min 7.0 ± 0.0 (~7) (n = 12)* 34.3% ± 2.4% (n = 12) 60% (18 out of 30)**

*P < 0.05 versus Ischemia. **P < 0.01 versus Ischemia. P < 0.01 versus EA-45 min. Note that EA significantly reduced the infarct volume, neurological deficit, and death rate and this protective effect became better and better when the length of EA increased from 5 to 30 minutes. However, EA for 45 mins did not improve the neurological deficit and infarct volume and even increased the death rate.