Summary
Tissue maintenance and regeneration is dependent on stem cells and increasing evidence has shown to decline with age. Stem cell based-aging is thought to influence therapeutic efficacy. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are involved in tissue regeneration. Here, we discuss the effects of age-related changes on MSC properties considering their possible use in research or regenerative medicine.
Keywords: stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), aging, regenerative medicine
Introduction
The interesting overlap between the biology of aging and the biology of stem cells has been reviewed extensively1–3. Ageing is accompanied by a progressive decline in stem cell function, resulting in less effective tissue homeostasis and repair. Tissue maintenance and regeneration is dependent on stem cells and therefore, any loss in number or functionality due to aging will likely have a profound effect on our regenerative capacity4. Therefore, understanding the basic molecular pathways of age-related stem cell dysfunction in mammals and how stem cell functionality changes with age, including impaired self-renewal and aberrant differentiation potential, have significant implications for regenerative medicine and the goal of extending ‘healthspan’5.
Aging of somatic tissues and organs comes along with a decline of regenerative capacity. Often, tissue homeostasis, regeneration and repair involve the consecutive emergence and parallel integration of new parenchymal cells, which descend from undifferentiated precursors.
In adults, mesenchymal stromal cells contain tissue-specific multipotent stem cells, which can be found throughout the body. Multipotent stromal progenitor cells also known as Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) are pertinent tissue-specific stem cells in adult beings. The concept of MSC appears to be particularly interesting since this special type of precursor can bring forth a large spectrum of cell types as diverse as bone, cartilage, tendon, or fat precursor cells. MSCs are in the center of attention of many investigators due to easy isolation from many tissues. MSCs capability to differentiate into many cell types makes them a starting point of many new therapies, especially in tissue engineering.
MSCs reside in a complex three-dimensional network, which comprises a plethora of other cell types such as, in the case of bone marrow, hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), adipocytes, and endothelial cells, altogether embedded in distinct extracellular matrix, and within this blend, MSC guide differentiation of hematopoietic precursor cells into mature progeny6,7. MSCs appear to exert yet another pertinent function, namely maintaining blood vessel integrity8,9. Linked to these presumptions, it can be envisaged that upon tissue damage and injury, MSCs are being activated and/or released from their perivascular niche, in order to support wound healing and tissue regeneration. While extensive research regarding the “Aging-topic” has been undertaken for HSC, and distinct age-related changes and potent molecular mechanisms could be deciphered, distinct details about MSC aging taking place in vivo is scarce, simply because we are still lacking consistent knowledge about intrinsic properties in a bodily setting.
However, understanding the process of MSC-aging is crucial for selecting donors for cellular therapies, which is necessary for successful treatment. Cellular changes can be divided into three major groups that include alterations affecting: 1) proliferation rate 2) differentiation capability 3) genome stability. Although many tools have been extensively described to evaluate age-related transformations in MSCs, the aging-process still eludes and further investigations are required. The aim of this review is to take a deep insight into the multidirectional interactions among MSCs, niches and tissues that may contribute to the aged-associated changes. Moreover, significant aspects of MSC-based therapies will be considered to highlight practical limitations that might impair a safe and efficient clinical application.
Aging in MSCs
With advancing age, ascending deficit of cellular proliferation or signal transduction control in MSCs may lead to differentiation process which affects such as the accumulation of fat deposits in bone and muscles, or impaired healing and fibrosis after severe injury, yet also altered hemopoiesis and autoimmunity.
One major feature of aging is an overall decline in regenerative vigor in many parts of the body. Several functional studies have tackled the question of whether age-associated changes would impinge on MSC properties with respect to their inherent regenerative potential. It is generally accepted that MSC span several hierarchical levels in cell repair and maintenance. MSC are considered a cell source for replenishing worn-out bone, and in case of failure, bone becomes prone to developing osteopenia. Patients with osteoporosis exhibit differences in MSCs, even though subtle10,11. MSCs are also subject to modulation by the systemic environment12,13. Systemically active factors may not only guide fate decisions according to local differentiation cues but may directly impact on the stem cells’ fitness.
Analogously to somatic cells, stem cells experience lifelong exposure to substances such as ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species), biological toxins, harmful chemical agents or physical stressors, which taken together may lead to premature ageing or senescence of individual cells, or provokes accelerated cell death, as well as to cellular transformation risk14–16. Indeed, gross evaluations of increased production of ROS17 deviating SOD (Super Oxide Dismutase) activity18, whole genome gene expression profiles12,19, and epigenetic signatures20 have been reported only recently.
In addition, disrupted inflammatory cues may scramble the delicate balance of regulatory networks necessary to govern tissue specific regeneration and remodeling. It has been shown that levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines are increased in older people24 and slightly elevated levels of inflammatory stimuli are supporting wound and bone healing by supporting osteoblastogenesis25. Deviations of the age-associated osteogenic potential of MSCs isolated from aged donors appears to decline while the respective adipogenic differentiation performance remains unchanged, or worse, is found to be enhanced21–23. Contrasted to well adjusted levels, an inflammatory overshoot, be it acutely or chronically, favors adipogenic differentiation. This is in line with observations that bone loss, also included in the advance of osteoporosis in the course of autoimmune disorders of bone, is associated, if not caused by inflammatory disorders26,27. Thus, dominant aberrations within the MSC microenvironment may arise from systemic chronic inflammation, which as mentioned above occurs regularly in elderly persons. It may also be mediated through unbalanced inflammatory and anti-inflammatory networks as a consequence to life-long antigenic burden or age-related diseases. These circumstances are often circumscribed by the term “inflamm-aging”28.
To date no molecular markers are available, which specifically reflect the degree of cellular ageing in MSC population. It has been recently shown that CD295 (leptin receptor) was found to increase as a function of intrinsic aging. Cells, which are double positive for the necrosis marker 7-AAD as well as for the apoptosis marker annexin V are generally considered to be dying cells. Consequently, this particular MSC subpopulation, which is cell-death-prone, can be discriminated by an elevated level of CD295 exposed at the cell surface. Conclusively, enhanced CD295 expression marks apoptotic cells. In the context of proliferating MSC, the appearance of CD295 bright cells emphasizes that the rate of cell death corresponds with the number of cells that fail to self-renew. Interestingly, the death rate steadily rises with increasing cellular age. Taken this example into further consideration, it is certainly more valuable to distinguish phenotypic appearances in MSCs, which are being isolated from differently aged healthy individuals to unveil those mechanisms, which actually take place in a natural situation instead of solely studying in vitro MSC senescence29.
A first plain question regarding age-related variations is whether MSC numbers change during adult life span. Considering the declining proliferative potential with age, variance in long-term culture could be referred to the MSC telomere-attrition at high passages and the relative genotoxic stress eventually may contribute to the limited replicative in vitro life-span. However the length of telomeric ends, although being significantly higher in children30 is maintained at a considerable long length in adult age12,31. This suggests that expression of telomerase takes place in vivo MSCs at very low constitutive levels, or in a transient fashion thereby maintaining the proper structure of chromosome ends. This clearly shows that changes occurring in vivo MSCs are only insufficiently described by patchy examinations of MSCs, which are replicative aged in culture. In this context, it is also worthwhile to assume that stem cells exhibit enhanced cellular repair capacities, or other still unveiled protective measures, which allow them to efficiently restore otherwise irreparable damages.
MSCs in regenerative medicine
The aging-area, that is likely to benefit from advances in the biology of adult stem cells, is the emerging field of regenerative medicine. However, therapeutic applications of MCSs to aged tissue repair in the context of diverse clinical conditions, including immunological disorders as well as degenerative diseases, will require an increased understanding of both stem-cell biology and host aged tissue environment as well as the interaction between the two32.
Currently, MSC clinical applications required the use of high cellular doses (up to several million cells/ patient body weight) together with efficient expansion protocols to generate a large number of cells based on traditional culture techniques33. Cultured MSCs into plastic tissue flasks are limited in terms of cell productivity and at least 2 to 3 cell passages are commonly required to achieve clinically relevant cell numbers in an acceptable period of time. Moreover, a rigorous set up of cell characterization assays to assure a safe and clinically effective MSC product is essential34. At this regard is important to note that, the effects of extended ex-vivo MSC cells obtained by consecutive cell passaging during long-term cultivation may lead to a senescent state of the cultured cells and ultimately can jeopardize MSC clinical safety and efficacy. Overall, MSC-senescence is a complex, finely organized process at genomic, transcriptomic, epigenetic and proteomic levels35. Although several biological processes have been described to be involved in the long-term culture effects of MSC populations, their precise molecular profile is still unknown and reliable molecular targets of cellular senescence are extremely necessary36. Genes or molecules involved in senescence pathways, known to be up regulated by senescence signals are of potential use for these biomarkers37.
However, there is an increasing knowledge that long-term ex-vivo cultivation has to be re-considered in order to avoid alterations in the efficacy and safety of the cellular product. Indeed, most of the reported clinical studies used expanded MSCs up to a maximum of 3 or 4 passages38. This was also the case of the MSC infusions that were used in the first clinical studies with ex-vivo expanded cells (2–3 passages were used) in Portugal to treat GvHD (Graft-versus-Host Disease) and as adjuvant of hematopoietic cell transplantation39.
Concordantly, growing clinical applications have been focused on the optimization of ex-vivo culture conditions for human MSC expansion by using a low oxygen environment (2%)40 or a microcarrier-based dynamic culture system41 operating under xenogeneic-free conditions.
However, nowadays a comprehensive control panel to attest MSC product quality is still to be defined and in order to guarantee the continuous advances of MSC-based therapies42.
At this regard, important improvement have been made by work of Madeira A. et al.43 showing that after 7 passages BM-MSCs, the proliferative and clonogenic potential were seriously affected, as well as their proteome profile, namely for proteins in the categories “Structural components and cellular cytoskeleton”, “Folding and stress response proteins”, “Energy metabolism”, “Cell cycle regulation and aging” and “Apoptosis”.
Since the approval of stem cell-based therapies by regulatory agencies (EMA or FDA) relies on a full characterization and safety of the cellular product, this study was a solid contribution to the efforts being made in this field, paving the way to the establishment of a proteomic analysis platform as a quality control panel for cultured MSC.
Conclusion
With the proportion of people over age 60 years growing rapidly in industrial countries, innovative regenerative medicine strategies for the elderly population are such a high priority. Age-related modification of MSC properties should be taken into account whenever they are intended for application in research or cytotherapy. Understanding the complex and dynamic interactions at the molecular, cellular and organ level alongside substantial individual variability requires deep investigation of the entire system involving multiple, interdisciplinary approaches. More rapid and reproducible methods are necessary to isolate, expand and better characterize MSC populations. In addition, further investigations are required to identify specific pathways involved in the activation of endogenous joint-associated stem cells that, in combination with MSCs, are important in the regeneration of a complete and functional tissue. Therefore, innovative approaches on stem cells aging in preclinical models are essential before their application for clinical translation.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Antonio Iacone for his support and discussion.
References
- 1.Drummond-Barbosa D. Stem cells, their niches and the systemic environment: an aging network. Genetics. 2008;180:1787–1797. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.098244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ferraro F, Celso CL, Scadden D. Adult stem cels and their niches. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;695:155–168. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7037-4_11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rando TA. Stem cells, ageing and the quest for immortality. Nature. 2006;441:1080–1086. doi: 10.1038/nature04958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bellantuono I. Aging of marrow stromal (skeletal) stem cells and their contribution to age-related bone loss. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792:364–370. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jones DL, Rando TA. Emerging models and paradigms for stem cell ageing. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:506–512. doi: 10.1038/ncb0511-506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mendez-Ferrer S, et al. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature. 2010;466:829–834. doi: 10.1038/nature09262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ding L, Saunders TL, Enikolopov G, Morrison SJ. Endothelial and perivascular cells maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2012;481:457–462. doi: 10.1038/nature10783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.da Silva Meirelles L, Caplan AI, Nardi NB. In search of the in vivo identity of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26:2287–2299. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Crisan M, et al. A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3:301–313. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kawai M, Devlin MJ, Rosen CJ. Fat targets for skeletal health. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009;5:365–372. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ozcivici E, Luu YK, Adler B, et al. Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6:50–59. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laschober GT, et al. Age-specific changes of mesenchymal stem cells are paralleled by upregulation of CD106 expression as a response to an inflammatory environment. Rejuvenation Res. 2011;14:119–131. doi: 10.1089/rej.2010.1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fehrer C, Lepperdinger G. Mesenchymal stem cell aging. Exp Gerontol. 2005;40:926–930. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2005.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brandl A, Meyer M, Bechmann V, Nerlich M, Angele P. Oxidative stress induces senescence in human mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Cell Res. 2011;317:1541–1547. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fehrer C, et al. Reduced oxygen tension attenuates differentiation capacity of human mesenchymal stem cells and prolongs their lifespan. Aging Cell. 2007;6:745–757. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00336.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kasper G. Insights into mesenchymal stem cell aging: involvement of antioxidant defense and actin cytoskeleton. Stem Cells. 2009;27:1288–1297. doi: 10.1002/stem.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stolzing A, Jones E, Mcgonagle D, Scutt A. Age-related changes in human bone, marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: consequences for cell therapies. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129:163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kemp K, Gray E, Mallam E, Scolding N, Wilkins A. Inflammatory cytokine induced regulation of superoxide dismutase 3 expression by human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2010;6:548–559. doi: 10.1007/s12015-010-9178-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Laschober GT, et al. Identification of evolutionarily conserved genetic regulators of cellular aging. Aging Cell. 2010;9:1084–1097. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00637.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bork S, Pfister S, Witt H, et al. DNA methylation pattern changes upon, long-term culture and aging of human mesenchymal stromal cells. Aging Cell. 2010;9:54–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00535.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.D'Ippolito G, Schiller PC, Ricordi C, Roos BA, Howard GA. Age-related osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stromal stem cells from human vertebral bone marrow. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:1115–1122. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.7.1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hoerman EJ, Teng K, Lipschitz DA, Lecka-Czernik B. Aging activates adipogenic and Crerki K, suppresses osteogenic programs in mesenchymal marrow stroma/stem cells: the role of PPAR-gamma2 transcription factor and TGF-beta/BMP signaling pathways. Aging Cell. 2004;3:379–389. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00127.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhou S, et al. Age-related intrinsic changes in human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and their differentiation to osteoblasts. Aging Cell. 2008;7:335–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00377.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.de Gonzalo-Calvo D, et al. Differential inflammatory responses in aging and disease: TNF-alpha and IL-6 as possible biomarkers. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;49:733–737. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Duque G, Huang DC, Macoritto M, et al. Autocrine regulation of interferon, gamma in mesenchymal stem cells plays a role in early osteoblastogenesis. Stem Cells. 2009;27:550–558. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hardy R, Cooper MS. Bone loss in inflammatory disorders. J Endocrinol. 2009;201:309–20. doi: 10.1677/JOE-08-0568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mohanty ST, et al. Alterations in the self-renewal and differentiation ability of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in a mouse model of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:149–61. doi: 10.1186/ar3098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Franceschi C, et al. Inflammaging and anti-inflammaging: a systemic perspective on aging and longevity emerged from studies in humans. Mech Ageing Dev. 2007;128:92–105. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Laschober GT, Brunaver R, Jamnig A, Fehrer C, Greiderer B, Lepperdinger G. Leptin receptor/CD295 is upregulated on primary human mesenchymal stem cells of advancing biological age and distinctly marks the subpopulation of dying cells. Exp Gerontol. 2009;44:57–62. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2008.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Choumerianou DM, Martimianaki G, Shakaki E, Kalmanti L, Kalmanti M, Dimitriou M. Comparative study of stemness characteristics of mesenchymal cells from bone marrow of children and adults. Cytotherapy. 2010;12:881–7. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.501790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wagner W, et al. Aging and replicative senescence have related effects on human stem and progenitor cells. PLoS One. 2009;4:5846–59. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mimeault M, Hauke R, Batra SK. Stem cells: a revolution in therapeutics-recent advances in stem cell biology and their therapeutic applications in regenerative medicine and cancer therapies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;82:252–64. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Blanc KL, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of steroid-resistant, severe, acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study. Lancet. 2008;371:1579–86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60690-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ringden O, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of therapy-resistant graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation. 2006;81:1390–97. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000214462.63943.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Garcia-Castro J, Trigueros C, Madrenas J, Pérez-Simon, Rodriguez R, Menendez P. Mesenchymal stem cells and their use as cell replacement therapy and disease modelling tool. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:2552–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00516.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wagner W, Ho AD, Zenke M. Different facets of aging in human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16:445–53. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2009.0825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nagaya N, et al. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells improves cardiac function in a rat model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2005;112:1128–35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.500447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dominici M, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–17. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bonab MM, Alimoghaddam K, Talebian F, Ghaffari SH, Ghavamzadeh A, Nikbin B. Aging of mesenchymal stem cell in vitro. BMC Cell Biol. 2006;7:14–21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-7-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kiyono T, Foster SA, Koop JI, McDougall JK, Galloway DA, Klingelhutz AJ. Both Rb/p16INK4a inactivation and telomerase activity are required to immortalize human epithelial cells. Nature. 1998;396:84–8. doi: 10.1038/23962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ho AD, Wagner W, Mahlknecht U. Stem cells and ageing. The potential of stem cells to overcome age-related deteriorations of the body in regenerative medicine. EMBO Rep. 2005;6:35–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Janzen V, et al. Stem-cell ageing modified by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a. Nature. 2006;443:421–26. doi: 10.1038/nature05159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Madeira A, da Silva CL, Dos Santos F, Comofeita E, Cabrol JM, Sà-Correia I, Madeira A, et al. Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Expression Program upon Extended Ex-Vivo Cultivation, as Revealed by 2-DE-Based Quantitative Proteomics. Plos one. 2012;8:43523–39. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
