Skip to main content
. 2013 May 6;110(21):8615–8620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220835110

Table 1.

Performance of DFE-alpha under its two demographic models

Simulation parameters
DFE-alpha (constant)
DFE-alpha (step-change)
sb α γ β α γ β α γ β ξ t
0.00 448 0.2 0.12 297 0.26 0.00 703 0.21 5.0 6.2
0.001 0.05 434 0.2 0.20 264 0.27 0.07 676 0.21 5.0 5.4
0.001 0.09 437 0.2 0.22 288 0.26 0.09 914 0.20 8.8 5.2
0.001 0.18 441 0.2 0.27 265 0.27 0.15 754 0.21 8.8 5.4
0.001 0.28 422 0.2 0.40 276 0.27 0.29 1,055 0.20 10.0 4.6
0.001 0.37 836 0.2 0.50 354 0.28 0.41 1,250 0.21 10.0 4.7
0.001 0.49 1,638 0.2 0.57 532 0.29 0.48 2438 0.21 10.0 4.2
0.01 0.06 424 0.2 0.24 233 0.27 0.11 635 0.21 5.0 4.9
0.01 0.09 424 0.2 0.26 217 0.29 0.12 675 0.22 10.0 4.7
0.01 0.18 381 0.2 0.40 152 0.31 0.24 654 0.21 10.0 3.5
0.01 0.27 339 0.2 0.49 109 0.34 0.31 618 0.21 10.0 2.8
0.01 0.36 652 0.2 0.58 158 0.35 0.43 1,113 0.22 10.0 2.6
0.01 0.47 1,154 0.2 0.68 182 0.38 0.53 1,802 0.22 10.0 2.1

Each row denotes a particular simulation run with the parameters specified in the left four columns. The average strength of purifying selection Inline graphic was calculated from the mean of the DFE used in the simulation and Inline graphic inferred from heterozygosity at synonymous sites. The middle three columns show the estimates from DFE-alpha under the demographic model with constant population size. The last five columns show the estimates under the demographic model with a single population size change. Inline graphic is the inferred ratio between present and ancient population size; t is the estimated time since the population size change in units of Inline graphic generations.