Table 3.
Geometric least squares means for des-CIC | ||||
| ||||
Variable | Treatment A 160 μg CIC with spacer (Test) | Treatment C 160 μg CIC no spacer (Reference) | Ratio [% Ref] | 90% Confidence interval# |
| ||||
AUCτ (μg*h/L) | 0.601 | 0.475 | 127 | 107–149 |
Cmax (μg/L) | 0.190 | 0.123 | 155 | 132–181 |
| ||||
Variable | Treatment B 80 μg CIC with spacer (Test) | Treatment C 160 μg CIC no spacer (Reference) | Ratio [% Ref] | 90% Confidence interval# |
| ||||
AUCτ (μg*h/L) | 0.599 | 0.475 | 126 | 106–149 |
Cmax (μg/L) | 0.201 | 0.123 | 163 | 140–190 |
90% Confidence Interval for difference between the treatments. AUC, Area under the AUCτ, AUC over the dosage interval τ (at steady-state).
For the ANOVA, sequence and period were considered as fixed and patient nested in a sequence as random effect, resulting in a 90% CI for the ratio of the expected means. Each PK characteristic was log-transformed prior to analysis and for each log-transformed variable, a 90% CI was computed for the difference of means between the treatments under comparison. The limits of the 90% CI on the log-scale were log-transformed resulting in confidence limits on the original scale for the ratio of geometric means expressed as percentages.