Skip to main content
. 2010 May 5;4:1–10. doi: 10.4137/cmped.s4311

Table 3.

Ratios and 90% confidence limits of des-CIC pharmacokinetic parameter estimates on Day 7 (per-protocol population).

Geometric least squares means for des-CIC

Variable Treatment A 160 μg CIC with spacer (Test) Treatment C 160 μg CIC no spacer (Reference) Ratio [% Ref] 90% Confidence interval#

AUCτ (μg*h/L) 0.601 0.475 127 107–149
Cmax (μg/L) 0.190 0.123 155 132–181

Variable Treatment B 80 μg CIC with spacer (Test) Treatment C 160 μg CIC no spacer (Reference) Ratio [% Ref] 90% Confidence interval#

AUCτ (μg*h/L) 0.599 0.475 126 106–149
Cmax (μg/L) 0.201 0.123 163 140–190
#

90% Confidence Interval for difference between the treatments. AUC, Area under the AUCτ, AUC over the dosage interval τ (at steady-state).

For the ANOVA, sequence and period were considered as fixed and patient nested in a sequence as random effect, resulting in a 90% CI for the ratio of the expected means. Each PK characteristic was log-transformed prior to analysis and for each log-transformed variable, a 90% CI was computed for the difference of means between the treatments under comparison. The limits of the 90% CI on the log-scale were log-transformed resulting in confidence limits on the original scale for the ratio of geometric means expressed as percentages.