Skip to main content
. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064621

Table 3. Summary of proteomics data.

Protein discovery (PD) Highest quality (HQ)
Statistic O. exa. O. gar. O. sph. Total O. exa. O. gar. O. sph. Total
N raw spectra 9676 8419 7840 25 935 7433 6648 6344 20 425
N clean spectra 9357 8181 7588 25 126 7127 6426 6102 19 655
N unique peptides 4072 3835 4137 7487 2932 2878 3164 5496
N proteins (transcriptome)1 1748 1672 1610 2644 1201 1222 1206 1603
N proteins (non-transcriptome)2 403 405 439 887 130 134 143 204
Total N proteins 2110 1943 2031 3531 1331 1356 1349 1807

Data are presented for species individually and for the total of all three species combined. The protein discovery (PD) analysis was performed at a protein identification threshold of 90%, the highest quality (HQ) data set was compiled at a threshold of 99%. For spectra, numbers are given before (‘raw’) and after (‘clean’) removal of known contaminants. All other numbers were obtained from cleaned spectra only.

1

Proteins matching a sequence in the Ophrys reference transcriptome. In the HQ data set, 115 were 454 singleton reads, 4 Sanger singleton reads, 388 Solexa contigs, 343 pyrosequencing isotigs and 753 combined 454/Solexa contigs. Among these 1603 HQ orchid proteins, no peptide matched translations from different strands, and only 11 proteins (0.7%) had peptides matching to two reading frames of the same transcript strand (in each case due to a single frame shift).

2

Proteins not matching any Ophrys transcript, but with SwissProt and/or TAIR9 database hit.